1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)92481-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Bacteriuria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
20
0
2

Year Published

1971
1971
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…saprophyticus and symptoms of urethritis had disappeared within a fortnight in some men not given antibiotic treatment agrees with the observation of spontaneous cure in women of urinary tract infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (Mabeck, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…saprophyticus and symptoms of urethritis had disappeared within a fortnight in some men not given antibiotic treatment agrees with the observation of spontaneous cure in women of urinary tract infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (Mabeck, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…epidermidis urinary infection were more likely to have an underlying anatomical abnormality. Mabeck (1969) also observed that urinary infections with Staph. epidermidis were more likely to undergo spontaneous cure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…epidermidis in the urine aspirated from the bladder is suggestive of contamination by skin flora. However, Mabeck (1969) and Bailey (1970) thought that these organisms could be true urinary pathogens. Moreover, Bailey (1970) found that women with Staph.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Mitchell (1968) reported that staphylococcal infections attributable to abnormalities or instrumentation of the urinary tract were caused predominantly by staphylococcus subgroups II, V, and VI, as defined by Baird-Parker (1963), and infections occurring in otherwise healthy young women by micrococcus subgroup 3 supporting evidence has been accumulating slowly (Mabeck, 1969;Kerr, 1973;Maskell, 1974;Meers, 1974;Meers et al, 1975;Sellin et al, 1975). Mitchell (1968) suggested that micrococcus 3 could be provisionally identified by its resistance to novobiocin in vitro.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%