1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1986.tb09029.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of Dipstick Haematuria. 1. Correlation with Microscopy of the Urine

Abstract: The reliability of a chemical test for haematuria has been evaluated in patients referred for investigation of suspected renal or urological disease. Red blood cells in concentrations of 10/microliter or greater were found in 24% of urines giving a negative dipstick result, 82% of urines giving a trace positive result and nearly 100% of urines giving dipstick results greater than this. The accuracy of the reagent strip in predicting the presence or absence of significant haematuria was improved by testing seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
17
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Limiting inclusion in the study to only those patients with microscopically confirmed microhematuria could theoretically have reduced false positives. However, previous studies have shown that the predictive value of a persistently positive urine dipstick for 'large' blood is very high (>99%) for true microhematuria [12,13]. Moreover, by eliminating from our study patients with only dipstick-positive microhematuria, we would have run the risk of increasing the number of false-negatives since delays in processing urine specimens and errors in centrifugation in a busy laboratory, such as at our center, significantly reduce the reliability of urine microscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Limiting inclusion in the study to only those patients with microscopically confirmed microhematuria could theoretically have reduced false positives. However, previous studies have shown that the predictive value of a persistently positive urine dipstick for 'large' blood is very high (>99%) for true microhematuria [12,13]. Moreover, by eliminating from our study patients with only dipstick-positive microhematuria, we would have run the risk of increasing the number of false-negatives since delays in processing urine specimens and errors in centrifugation in a busy laboratory, such as at our center, significantly reduce the reliability of urine microscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The authors found significant haematuria in 24% of urine samples giving a negative dipstick result and in 82% of those giving a positive result [8]. The documented sensitivity of urine dipstick is over 90%, although the specificity is limited to between 65 and 99% due to the high false positive rate [9].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Haematuriamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Dipstick urinalysis and urine culture are also recommended. 7 Workup of hematuria is discussed in Chapters 4 and 59.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Patient With Suspected Chronic Kidney Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%