1998
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of fetal intracardiac echogenic foci in relation to trisomy 21: a prospective sonographic study of high-risk pregnant women.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some investigators have demonstrated that only a minority of fetuses with ECFs have other sonographic abnormalities (4%, 10 4.5%, 8 16%, 12 and 16% 15 ), the current population demonstrated a higher prevalence of other sonographic abnormalities. Forty-four of 244 (18%) fetuses with ECF had other sonographic findings; 200 of 244 (82%) had isolated ECF.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although some investigators have demonstrated that only a minority of fetuses with ECFs have other sonographic abnormalities (4%, 10 4.5%, 8 16%, 12 and 16% 15 ), the current population demonstrated a higher prevalence of other sonographic abnormalities. Forty-four of 244 (18%) fetuses with ECF had other sonographic findings; 200 of 244 (82%) had isolated ECF.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Although the study period of 2 years, the total number of sonograms (approximately 5100), and the number of fetuses with ECF (244 of 5100) are equal to or greater than those in other studies, 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] the current study is still limited by the lack of complete outcome information on those patients declining amniocentesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the inclusion of the four-chamber view in the standard anatomical ultrasound evaluation, the finding of fetal cardiac echogenic foci has understandably increased significantly. Most studies have included fetuses at risk for chromosomal abnormalities and mothers with risk factors such as advanced maternal age or abnormal serum screening [2,5,[8][9][10]. Studies on low-risk populations have reached the conclusion that the finding of echogenic foci is most likely a variant of the normal if detected as an isolated finding [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 In a total of 5480 women undergoing amniocentesis, the prevalence of EIF was 4.6% (253 cases) and trisomy 21 was diagnosed in 23 cases (9.1%) of the 253 fetuses with EIF and in 69 (1.3%) of the 5227 without EIF. 9,[16][17][18] In studies of low population such an association was not confirmed. In a study of 9263 low-risk pregnancies, 153 fetuses had EIF and none of them had trisomy 21.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 91%