1989
DOI: 10.1089/end.1989.3.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of Hypoechoic Lesions in the Irradiated Prostate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33,34 Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) has been investigated in the postradiated prostate. Although it has been shown by some that persistent foci of malignancy retained their hypoechoic appearance after radiation and successfully treated areas reverted to isoechogenecity, 35,36 this has not been the universal experience as shown by Kabalin et al, 5 showing 65% of biopsied sectors were positive. Nevertheless, TRUS is valuable as a guidance tool to enhance detection of recurrence, as clearly illustrated by Egawa et al 37 showing 67% detection rate compared to the 22% for the digital biopsies.…”
Section: ±7mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…33,34 Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) has been investigated in the postradiated prostate. Although it has been shown by some that persistent foci of malignancy retained their hypoechoic appearance after radiation and successfully treated areas reverted to isoechogenecity, 35,36 this has not been the universal experience as shown by Kabalin et al, 5 showing 65% of biopsied sectors were positive. Nevertheless, TRUS is valuable as a guidance tool to enhance detection of recurrence, as clearly illustrated by Egawa et al 37 showing 67% detection rate compared to the 22% for the digital biopsies.…”
Section: ±7mentioning
confidence: 97%