2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of neoadjuvant downstaging in gastric adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no indication that patients with chemotherapy-induced ypT0-1 had a worse prognosis, that is, the down-staging was not merely a cosmetic finding but seemed to confer a true survival benefit. Other studies have reported a similar prognosis of ypT1-2 cancers compared with pT1-2 cancers treated by upfront surgery [ 61 , 62 ], which parallels recently published observations even for stage II and III disease in the current control group [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There was no indication that patients with chemotherapy-induced ypT0-1 had a worse prognosis, that is, the down-staging was not merely a cosmetic finding but seemed to confer a true survival benefit. Other studies have reported a similar prognosis of ypT1-2 cancers compared with pT1-2 cancers treated by upfront surgery [ 61 , 62 ], which parallels recently published observations even for stage II and III disease in the current control group [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We observed a higher ORR and a higher proportion of patients achieving T downstaging (66.0% and 52.9%, respectively) in the CA-SAP group than in the SAP group (43.4% and 32.1%, respectively). As previously reported, significant downstaging could provide favorable conditions for curative surgery 77 . In addition to the promising tumor response results, a remarkable improvement in the R0 resection rate was observed with CA-SAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This approach did meet the requirement for the response mode to translate into strata of significantly different long-term survival rates ( Figure 3 and Figure 4 ), and it complies with the intuitive notion of improved survival following downstaging. These findings are novel, as published data on this approach to response evaluation are scarce [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 44 ]. In a multivariable ordinal regression model, the tumor location and Lauren histological type were significant determinants of the response mode, whereas gender, age, and rTNM stage were not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To circumvent this problem, a composite method of downstaging is suggested, where the radiological stage at diagnosis (rTNM) is compared to the pathological stage following chemotherapy (ypTNM). Published data on this approach to response evaluation in gastric cancer are scarce [ 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%