1990
DOI: 10.1130/spe253-p277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of past and recent heat-flow and radioactivity studies in the Southern Rocky Mountains region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uplift of both Archean and Proterozoic rock during the Laramide orogeny indicates that the mantle beneath both regions has been modified by orogenic processes. Yet major differences between Archean and Proterozoic lithospheres are still evident today in the Rocky Mountain region based on early results from the Deep Probe experiment (see Snelson et al, this issue), the Rocky Mountain Front Broadband experiment (Lerner-Lam et al, this issue), as well as heat flow data (Decker et al, 1988) and topography. From the cumulative record, we conclude that Archean mantle is remarkably stable, but that it can be modified and even removed under the right conditions.…”
Section: Speculations On Processes Of Litho-sphere Formation and Modimentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The uplift of both Archean and Proterozoic rock during the Laramide orogeny indicates that the mantle beneath both regions has been modified by orogenic processes. Yet major differences between Archean and Proterozoic lithospheres are still evident today in the Rocky Mountain region based on early results from the Deep Probe experiment (see Snelson et al, this issue), the Rocky Mountain Front Broadband experiment (Lerner-Lam et al, this issue), as well as heat flow data (Decker et al, 1988) and topography. From the cumulative record, we conclude that Archean mantle is remarkably stable, but that it can be modified and even removed under the right conditions.…”
Section: Speculations On Processes Of Litho-sphere Formation and Modimentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Durrheim & Mooney, 1994;Karlstrom et _ al., 2002). More recent studies (e.g., Gilbert & Sheehan, 2004;Karlstrom et _ al., 2012) Decker, 1995, andDecker et al, 1988) but without explaining the revision; on this basis a slightly thicker mobile lower-crustal layer would be predicted. We are not aware of any measurement of the heat production in this particular borehole; however the value adopted is similar to others measured in the surrounding region (e.g., Edwards et al, 1978) and the resulting basal heat flow is within the ~34±4 mW m -2 range long considered characteristic of the Great Plains (e.g., Roy et al, 1968;Decker & Smithson, 1975).…”
Section: The Platte River Catchmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In northern New Mexico and Colorado, the rift is associated with a clearly defined heat flow high. Conductive geotherms calculated from these data suggest geotherms that exceed the crustal solidus above the Moho, requiring convective heat transfer into the crust Decker et al, 1988). In summary, heat flow data clearly define a major geothermal anomaly associated with the Rio Grande rift.…”
Section: Tectonics and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 93%