2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
160
2
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
160
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there is little consensus as to which sperm characteristic is the best predictor of fertility [28]. Consequently, different associations of sperm parameters have been proposed to predict pregnancy and miscarriage [7,22,32,34]. We have found that conventional sperm parameters and apoptotic markers (membrane asymmetry loss, DNA denaturation and MMP) are related to natural conception and conception in IUI cycles, but not to IVF/ICSI conception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is little consensus as to which sperm characteristic is the best predictor of fertility [28]. Consequently, different associations of sperm parameters have been proposed to predict pregnancy and miscarriage [7,22,32,34]. We have found that conventional sperm parameters and apoptotic markers (membrane asymmetry loss, DNA denaturation and MMP) are related to natural conception and conception in IUI cycles, but not to IVF/ICSI conception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperm concentration, motility and morphology have been correlated with fertilization rates in vivo and in vitro [28]. Of these, several clinical studies have demonstrated a clear association between sperm head morphology and improvement in IVF success rate [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressive motility and non-progressive motility is reported as total motility. On one hand, some have considered sperm motility as one of the most powerful discriminators [Nallella et al 2006], while on the other hand, others have found this test to be of limited value [Bonde et al 1998]. …”
Section: Motilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison the Tygerberg strict criteria identifies normal sperm using a scaled measure for each single ellipseshaped head, the percentage of the head occupied by the acrosome, the width and length of the midpiece, the tail length and appearance, and the amount and location of cytoplasmic droplet/residual body. Opinion varies as to the efficacy of this measure as an effective predictor of fertility [Chia et al 1998;Guzick et al 2001;Nallella et al 2006].…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%