2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significance of the remarkable unconformity in the Plio–Pleistocene of the Japanese Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bando‐1 (Ise), Nishihirao (Kakegawa), and KH (Boso) Tephra Beds are described as the Obr‐Bando1 Tephra (Tamura & Yamazaki 2010), which is in the lower part of the Matuyama Chronozone (C2r2r: Nakayama & Yoshikawa 1990). The biohorizon of coiling change in the genus Pulleniatina occurs around this tephra (Oda 1977).…”
Section: Tephra Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Bando‐1 (Ise), Nishihirao (Kakegawa), and KH (Boso) Tephra Beds are described as the Obr‐Bando1 Tephra (Tamura & Yamazaki 2010), which is in the lower part of the Matuyama Chronozone (C2r2r: Nakayama & Yoshikawa 1990). The biohorizon of coiling change in the genus Pulleniatina occurs around this tephra (Oda 1977).…”
Section: Tephra Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OK III (Nagaoka) and SR (Boso) Tephra Beds are described as the OM1‐OK3 Tephra, which correlates with the OM1 Tephra in the north of the Chubu Mountains (Tamura & Yamazaki 2010). This tephra is near the Reunion Subchronozone (C2r1n: Niitsuma 1976), and the biohorizon of coiling change in the genus Pulleniatina (Oda 1977).…”
Section: Tephra Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, to the north of the Equator in central Japan (35°N) there is an extensive Pliocene–Pleistocene unconformity, but in this case the dating has been constrained using tephrochronology, microfossils, palaeomagnetism, sequence stratigraphy and oxygen isotope ratios (Tamura and Yamazaki, 2010). The process(es) of formation of the Kurotaki unconformity and corresponding unconformities in the Kinki, Tokai, Kanto and Chubu regions of central Japan, however, are not well understood.…”
Section: Other Locations (See Fig 1 For Locations)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process(es) of formation of the Kurotaki unconformity and corresponding unconformities in the Kinki, Tokai, Kanto and Chubu regions of central Japan, however, are not well understood. The bounding strata accumulated in deep marine environments, and although it is normally assumed that unconformities are formed as a result of uplift or emergence, none of these strata appear to be associated with sea‐level change (Tamura and Yamazaki, 2010). The timing of these unconformities across central Japan is bracketed by a range of ages for the underlying (2.7–4.15 Ma) and overlying (1.78–2.9 Ma) strata.…”
Section: Other Locations (See Fig 1 For Locations)mentioning
confidence: 99%