in vestibular schwannoma patients with functional hearing status, surgical resection while preserving the hearing is feasible. Hearing levels, tumor size, and location of the tumor have been known to be candidates of predictors. We used a machine learning approach to predict hearing outcomes in vestibular schwannoma patients who underwent hearing preservation surgery: middle cranial fossa, or retrosigmoid approach. After reviewing the medical records of 52 patients with a pathologically confirmed vestibular schwannoma, we included 50 patient's records in the study. Hearing preservation was regarded as positive if the postoperative hearing was within serviceable hearing (50/50 rule). The categorical variable included the surgical approach, and the continuous variable covered audiometric and vestibular function tests, and the largest diameter of the tumor. Four different algorithms were lined up for comparison of accuracy: support vector machine(SVM), gradient boosting machine(GBM), deep neural network(DNN), and diffuse random forest(DRF). The average accuracy of predicting hearing preservation ranged from 62% (SVM) to 90% (DNN). The current study is the first to incorporate machine learning methodology into a prediction of successful hearing preservation surgery. Although a larger population may be needed for better generalization, this study could aid the surgeon's decision to perform a hearing preservation approach for vestibular schwannoma surgery.Vestibular schwannomas (VSs), or acoustic neuromas are benign tumors arising from the cochleovestibular nerve, which grows slowly 1 . It accounts for 6-8% of all intracranial tumors and is the most common cerebellopontine angle tumor 2 . Recently, with the help of better access to magnetic resonance imaging, the incidence has been increased, and the tumor size at the time of diagnosis has decreased 3,4 . With more early detection rates, more patients are asymptomatic when diagnosed. In these patients, the following management options may all be feasible: watchful waiting, surgery, or stereotactic radiosurgery(SRS). However, there are no clear guidelines or consensus on the optimal management of small VSs, and the optimal treatment is still under debate 5,6 . Treatment options differ individually and are dependent upon the physician's experience, the size and growth rate of the tumor, age, patient's preference, and hearing status. If the tumor is too big, or hearing is below serviceable hearing, hearing preservation is not essential in treatment 7 . Nevertheless, in small to medium-sized tumors with serviceable hearing, hearing preservation surgeries can be offered. Currently, middle cranial fossa approach(MCFA) and retrosigmoid approach(RSA) are the two most commonly used approaches to remove VSs.The selection between the two approaches depends on the size and location of the tumor, and the surgeon's preference, as each procedure has its strengths in exposing regions of the internal auditory canal or cerebellopontine angle. The preservation rate of MCFA and RSA varies...