2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant correlation between a set of genetic polymorphisms and a functional brain network revealed by feature selection and sparse Partial Least Squares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
116
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note the relationship between CCA and PLS coefficients in equations (6,9) and equations (7,10), respectively. PLS does not take into account the covariations between the responses Y explicitly.…”
Section: Partial Least Squaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note the relationship between CCA and PLS coefficients in equations (6,9) and equations (7,10), respectively. PLS does not take into account the covariations between the responses Y explicitly.…”
Section: Partial Least Squaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many variants of RRR, CCA, and PLS have been proposed, such as using an 2 regularization on X and Y [13], or using an 1 regularization on the reduced-rank coefficients [6], [7]. Here, we propose to experiment low-rank regularizations of the whitening matrix Γ = (Y T Y) −1 .…”
Section: E Regularized Reduced-rank Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another approach is to find linear combinations of features and responses that best correlate with each other using partial least square (PLS) or canonical correlation analysis (CCA), which can be cast as a reduced rank regression (RRR) problem [4]. In limited sample settings, especially when the number of features exceeds the number of samples, sparse variants of PLS, CCA, and RRR are often used [5], but these sparse variants in their raw forms suffer the same limitation as SMR in terms of false positives not being controlled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity at each time point was normalized to the first TR (labelled TR 0 in the figures). For all analyses, we ran 1000 permutations (Le Floch et al, 2012;McIntosh et al, 1996) to determine significant LVs at p < 0.001. In addition, we ran 100 bootstraps, estimating the standard errors of the salience for each voxel in order to assess the reliability and robustness of each voxel's contribution to a pattern of brain activity.…”
Section: Prs-fmri Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%