2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant Discrepancies Between Diagnostic and Pathologic Gleason Sums in Prostate Cancer: The Predictive Role of Age and Prostate-Specific Antigen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each biopsy core, the template coordinate and the offset from base were recorded. Biopsy regions included posterior prostate (3,4,12,13,21,22), posterior lateral (2,5,11,14,20,23), anterior lateral (1,6,9,10,15,16), anterior apex (19,24), and TZ (7,8,17,18) After completion of all sampling, patients underwent cystoscopic evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For each biopsy core, the template coordinate and the offset from base were recorded. Biopsy regions included posterior prostate (3,4,12,13,21,22), posterior lateral (2,5,11,14,20,23), anterior lateral (1,6,9,10,15,16), anterior apex (19,24), and TZ (7,8,17,18) After completion of all sampling, patients underwent cystoscopic evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The prospect of undergrading particularly affects men who are considering a course of close observation for suspected minimal disease identified on biopsy. Epstein et al 7 evaluated prostatectomy specimens of 103 men believed to have insignificant cancer based on an initial TRUS biopsy.…”
Section: Potential Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Isariyawongse et al reported significant discrepancies between diagnostic and pathologic Gleason sum scores in PCa and noted the predictive role of age and prostate-specific antigen [20]. A more recent study by Dinh et al into the incidence and predictors of upgrading and upstaging among 10,000 contemporary patients with low risk PCa found that following prostatectomy, 44% of cases was upgraded and 9.7% were up staged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many urologists and patients are reluctant to monitor their cancer on active surveillance due to concerns for delaying treatment or potentially missing treatment of aggressive cancer during a window of cure. Evidence for inadequacy of staging and risk stratification is demonstrated by the increase in Gleason Grade from Gleason 6-7 or higher in 40% of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) (13,14). Thus, significant discrepancies between prostate needle biopsy and RP specimens may be attributed to diagnostic pitfalls as only 2% of the prostate is sampled with a biopsy (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%