2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-018-2075-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant Effects of Shallow Seismic and Stress Properties on Phase Velocities of Rayleigh Waves Up to 20 s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with our observations on velocity reductions in the top 22 m associated with weak ground motion. Rubinstein and Beroza () showed that temporal changes of S wave velocities caused by the 2004 Parkfield earthquake concentrate in the top 100 m. Modeling results from Yang et al () suggest that temporal changes of seismic velocities in the top 1–3 km can produce observable changes in analyses using Rayleigh waves with periods of 5–20 s. Therefore, resolving the depth range of temporal changes based on sensitivity kernels of Rayleigh waves can be subjected to large uncertainties without information (e.g., from borehole data) on changes in the shallow crust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with our observations on velocity reductions in the top 22 m associated with weak ground motion. Rubinstein and Beroza () showed that temporal changes of S wave velocities caused by the 2004 Parkfield earthquake concentrate in the top 100 m. Modeling results from Yang et al () suggest that temporal changes of seismic velocities in the top 1–3 km can produce observable changes in analyses using Rayleigh waves with periods of 5–20 s. Therefore, resolving the depth range of temporal changes based on sensitivity kernels of Rayleigh waves can be subjected to large uncertainties without information (e.g., from borehole data) on changes in the shallow crust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the velocity model from ( 21 ) for depths greater than 500 m below the surface. Since the sensitivity kernels of surface waves can be significantly affected by the shallowest structure ( 51 ) and earthquake tomography is relatively insensitive to these depths, we used a generic velocity model for the shallow velocity structure at volcanoes ( 52 ) for the top 500 m. The coarseness of our velocity model at very shallow depths limits the resolution of the kernels that we calculate in the highest frequency bands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and 5 ). A recent study 37 showed that shallow (1-3 km) changes in rock fabrics (including the closure of fractures) can significantly impact phase velocity and attenuation at surface-wave periods up to 10 s, characterized by much deeper sensitivity peaks. This means that, even if closing at a very shallow depth 38 , 39 , fluid-filled fractures are still a valid explanation for our observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%