2020
DOI: 10.1002/pi.5956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant enhancement of thermal conductivity in graphite/polyester composite via interfacial π–π interaction

Abstract: Interfacial thermal resistance between matrix and filler is one of the most serious factors hindering heat transfer in composites. Here, a type of liquid crystalline polyester (LCP) containing phenyl pendant groups was intended to blend with pristine graphite by interfacial interaction. The intensity at 26.6° of the wide angle X‐ray diffraction pattern which exceeded that of pristine graphite indicated the existence of a strong interfacial π–π interaction. Both DSC and XRD tests showed that the ordered structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interplanar spacings, calculated according to the Bragg formula, 43,44 are: 3.39, 1.87, 0.464, 0.432, 0.371, and 0.302 nm for LCER1; 2.85, 1.42, 0.474, 0.433, 0.377, and 0.308 nm for LCER2; and 2.91, 1.43, 0.473, 0.435, 0.378, and 0.309 nm for LCER3. Meanwhile, the respective diffraction peaks at 2 θ = 29.55°, 28.93°, and 28.89° for LCER1, LCER2, and LCER3 indicate the formation of π–π stacking, 45 which proves the presence of ordered interlayer structures. In addition, the sharp diffraction peaks at 2 θ between 2 and 10° reveal the formation of a smectic layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The interplanar spacings, calculated according to the Bragg formula, 43,44 are: 3.39, 1.87, 0.464, 0.432, 0.371, and 0.302 nm for LCER1; 2.85, 1.42, 0.474, 0.433, 0.377, and 0.308 nm for LCER2; and 2.91, 1.43, 0.473, 0.435, 0.378, and 0.309 nm for LCER3. Meanwhile, the respective diffraction peaks at 2 θ = 29.55°, 28.93°, and 28.89° for LCER1, LCER2, and LCER3 indicate the formation of π–π stacking, 45 which proves the presence of ordered interlayer structures. In addition, the sharp diffraction peaks at 2 θ between 2 and 10° reveal the formation of a smectic layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The corresponding intermolecular packing model is shown in Figure 3(e). In addition, the sharp diffraction peak at 2θ = 27:1 °implies the formation of π-π stacking structure [46] (Figure 3(f)), because ester group makes contiguous benzene rings shift and offset to form "sidestep" structure, which is conducive to the formation of intermolecular π-π stacking. As temperature further decreases, crystalline state is formed, while previous sharp diffraction peaks are still present, indicating that the ordered structures formed in liquid crystal state are fixed during crystallization process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But their intrinsic λ values are still low (e.g., the λ of Vectra A950 type liquid crystal polyester is only 0.22 W/(m•K)) [42], and a large number of rigid structures in molecular chains inevitably raises the phase transition temperature, which is unfavorable for molding and processing [43][44][45]. Recently, researchers have devoted themselves to optimizing molecular structures of liquid crystal polyesters to decrease phase transition temperature, and simultaneously to enhance the orderliness of molecular structures in the hope of maximizing intrinsic λ of liquid crystal polyesters [46][47][48]. Wu et al [49] prepared several biphenyl-type polyesters, which contain flexible methylene units with different length, using BP, phenylsuccinic acid, 3-chloro-1-propanol, 6-chloro-1hexanol, and 9-bromo-1-nonanol by melt polycondensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%