Having reliable clinical CYP3A biomarkers is attractive to those engaged in drug development as well as to academic groups studying clinical variability resulting from differences or changes in basal individual metabolic status (eg, due to disease or genetics) or drug-drug interactions (DDI). Moreover, if biomarkers can be adequately qualified, it raises the possibility of their use to better anticipate the need, or lack thereof, for defined clinical studies to establish DDI potential. But qualification requires a comprehensive body of evidence that currently appears not to exist in the published literature.We have been following with interest the many reports on the use of plasma 4β-hydroxycholesterol (4βHC) as a potential clinical biomarker of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzyme activity in humans. Although 4βHC has been explored for both inhibition and induction of CYP3A, we have been interested in studies of CYP3A induction. These have included results from our own studies 1 as well as several other industry and academic groups.2-4 CYP3A is a major enzyme involved in the metabolic clearance of many drug substances. It has become apparent due to factors described below that the 4βHC biomarker is most amenable to the investigation of increases in CYP3A activity, for example, as a result of enzyme induction or the reversal of repression (ie, by removal of mechanisms that may reduce CYP3A expression such as inflammation).A critical factor in 4βHC use is an understanding of how consistently 4βHC plasma levels change in response to weak, moderate, and strong CYP3A inducers.3 In this regard, results from 6 recent studies suggest an emerging trend. [1][2][3][4][5][6] In drug development, establishing DDI potential for a drug coadministered with CYP3A enzyme inducers commonly involves determining drug exposure before and after dosing with a known strong inducer such as rifampicin.Accordingly a typical clinical DDI study would use the inducer rifampicin (RIF, 600 mg, repeated daily dosing for 14 days) to establish a maximum induction response. The maximum fold change in 4βHC levels can be established under the same conditions, before and after induction.1,3 But understanding the effects of moderate or weak CYP3A induction is also needed. Such information exists in reports of changes in 4βHC plasma concentrations in response to RIF daily doses of 10, 20, 100, and 500 mg (14 days), with these lesser doses of RIF as surrogates for low to moderate inducers.2,4 Together, using available published data, 1-6 these 4βHC changes allow one to establish an empirical relationship of RIF dose to 4βHC (left Y-axis) as shown in Figure 1. This relationship seems well described using a simple E max model (eg, E = 1 + E max × Dose/[ED50 + Dose], with E max = 3.55 [fold increase over baseline] and ED50 = 127 mg, r 2 = 0.90; E max is the maximum effect, and ED50 is the dose producing 50% of this maximum effect).An additional benchmark of the consequence of CYP3A induction (or inhibition) in the clinic is the corresponding change produced in...