“…The Laboratory started from two complementary theoretical paradigms: reflexivity, defined as a set of elements that are part of a process by which we understand the reasons why we act in a certain way and that implies a deliberate cognitive process based on a complex network of relationships designed to give meaning to actions and to stimulate new ones (Atkins & Murphy, 1995;Boud, Keogh, & Walker, 1985;Boyd & Fales, 1983;Chambers, Clarke, Colombo, & Askland, 2003;Fitzgerald, 1994;Reid, 1993;Daudelin, 1996;Mezirow, 1991;Schön, 1983); evaluation, designed as a strategic tool, which becomes a reflective practice when it manages to make us understand how and why we act in this way and that allows us to critically analyze and interpret the work (Fitzgerald, 1994), namely to consider some activities in order to give rise to "reflection for action" (reflection for action), in the course of action (reflection in action) or the action (reflection on action).…”