2003
DOI: 10.1080/13674580300200239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant learning incidents and critical conversations in an international context: promoting reflexivity with in-service students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Laboratory started from two complementary theoretical paradigms: reflexivity, defined as a set of elements that are part of a process by which we understand the reasons why we act in a certain way and that implies a deliberate cognitive process based on a complex network of relationships designed to give meaning to actions and to stimulate new ones (Atkins & Murphy, 1995;Boud, Keogh, & Walker, 1985;Boyd & Fales, 1983;Chambers, Clarke, Colombo, & Askland, 2003;Fitzgerald, 1994;Reid, 1993;Daudelin, 1996;Mezirow, 1991;Schön, 1983); evaluation, designed as a strategic tool, which becomes a reflective practice when it manages to make us understand how and why we act in this way and that allows us to critically analyze and interpret the work (Fitzgerald, 1994), namely to consider some activities in order to give rise to "reflection for action" (reflection for action), in the course of action (reflection in action) or the action (reflection on action).…”
Section: The Objectives Of the Aosta Laboratory Of Experimental Refle...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Laboratory started from two complementary theoretical paradigms: reflexivity, defined as a set of elements that are part of a process by which we understand the reasons why we act in a certain way and that implies a deliberate cognitive process based on a complex network of relationships designed to give meaning to actions and to stimulate new ones (Atkins & Murphy, 1995;Boud, Keogh, & Walker, 1985;Boyd & Fales, 1983;Chambers, Clarke, Colombo, & Askland, 2003;Fitzgerald, 1994;Reid, 1993;Daudelin, 1996;Mezirow, 1991;Schön, 1983); evaluation, designed as a strategic tool, which becomes a reflective practice when it manages to make us understand how and why we act in this way and that allows us to critically analyze and interpret the work (Fitzgerald, 1994), namely to consider some activities in order to give rise to "reflection for action" (reflection for action), in the course of action (reflection in action) or the action (reflection on action).…”
Section: The Objectives Of the Aosta Laboratory Of Experimental Refle...mentioning
confidence: 99%