2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9092-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant symptomatic relief after transoral endoscopic staple-assisted treatment of Zenker's diverticulum

Abstract: Our results confirm that minimal invasive treatment of Zenker's diverticulum is a safe method and provides significant symptomatic relief.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was considered in our case of a diverticulum in the lower third of the esophagus (also in consultation with the otorhinolaryngologist) but, because of its specific length and design, the stapling device is not feasible for the typical location of Zenker's diverticulum within the gastrointestinal tract, at the esophageai introitus. In addition, though the method has been extensively described as safe with a low morbidity rate (low risk of bleeding and perforation) of between 4% [25] and 7.7% [26], there is still a risk of vocal fold paresis (palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve) resulting from traction on the recurrent laryngeal nerve(s) secondary to an unfavorable patient anatomy [27]. Therefore, anatomical considerations may prevent its use [28] as in our case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This was considered in our case of a diverticulum in the lower third of the esophagus (also in consultation with the otorhinolaryngologist) but, because of its specific length and design, the stapling device is not feasible for the typical location of Zenker's diverticulum within the gastrointestinal tract, at the esophageai introitus. In addition, though the method has been extensively described as safe with a low morbidity rate (low risk of bleeding and perforation) of between 4% [25] and 7.7% [26], there is still a risk of vocal fold paresis (palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve) resulting from traction on the recurrent laryngeal nerve(s) secondary to an unfavorable patient anatomy [27]. Therefore, anatomical considerations may prevent its use [28] as in our case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We identified 6,915 patients from 93 studies evaluating the effect of the surgical treatment for ZD, including 52 studies [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59] (n = 3,336) on endoscopic surgeries, 22 [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81] (n = 2,204) on open surgeries, and 19 [3,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic procedure was not performed if the diverticulum was < 2 cm. In this situation, a complete myotomy is not guaranteed 5 . We also changed to open surgery if the exposure was not sufficient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%