2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gastre.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significantly elevated CA 19-9 levels in a patient with choledocholithiasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without an adequate clinical context, the isolated results of the marker could incorrectly lead to costly and unnecessary investigations and misdiagnosis of pancreatic or biliary malignancy. Although the first diagnosis to be considered is a malignant disease, the possibility of benign diseases should not be ruled out [4][5][6][7][8][9]16,17]. In our case, an explanation for the abnormally high CA 19-9 levels could be the increased production of CA 19-9 from the biliary epithelial cells and its decreased hepatobiliary clearance due to cholestasis, which may have contributed to abnormal CA 19-9 elevation in the bloodstream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Without an adequate clinical context, the isolated results of the marker could incorrectly lead to costly and unnecessary investigations and misdiagnosis of pancreatic or biliary malignancy. Although the first diagnosis to be considered is a malignant disease, the possibility of benign diseases should not be ruled out [4][5][6][7][8][9]16,17]. In our case, an explanation for the abnormally high CA 19-9 levels could be the increased production of CA 19-9 from the biliary epithelial cells and its decreased hepatobiliary clearance due to cholestasis, which may have contributed to abnormal CA 19-9 elevation in the bloodstream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It also explains why there was a gradual 3-week reduction of CA 19-9 levels after the cholecystectomy. Several authors reported high serum CA 19-9 levels in patients with benign biliary obstruction and jaundice due to choledocholithiasis, Mirizzi syndrome, or sclerosing cholangitis [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][14][15][16]. In addition, cases of acute cholecystitis, particularly xanthogranulomatous, have been reported with elevated levels of the marker [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2010, Korkmaz et al [ 12 ] documented a case of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis with acute cholangitis that had extremely high serum levels of CA 19-9 (9586 IU/ml), which decreased sharply after therapy. Canete-Ruiz et al [ 13 ] reported a case of a 69-year-old patient who presented with severe abdominal pain and deep jaundice. The patient was diagnosed with choledocholithiasis with dilated bile ducts with significant elevation of CA 19-9 to >12,000 IU/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%