2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40819-022-01248-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signomial Geometric Programming Approach to Solve Non-Linear Fractional Programming Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On varying 𝛼 ∈ [0, 1] due to proposed Method-2, the optimal range(lower and upper bounds) of the objective value is obtained as [βˆ’0.3717035, βˆ’0.2433155] in Tables 3 and 4. The following Figure 3 represents that the optimal objective value of the crisp NLFSPP obtained by Mishra and Ota [18] lies in the range of optimal objective values of fuzzy NLFFSPP obtained due to the proposed methods. In example 2, considering NLFFSPP as a crisp model the optimal solution is obtained as 𝑦 1 =0.5852915, 𝑦 2 =0.6997048, 𝑦 3 =0.5540157 and the corresponding optimal objective value is 𝑓 (𝑦) = βˆ’0.7102850.…”
Section: Comparative Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On varying 𝛼 ∈ [0, 1] due to proposed Method-2, the optimal range(lower and upper bounds) of the objective value is obtained as [βˆ’0.3717035, βˆ’0.2433155] in Tables 3 and 4. The following Figure 3 represents that the optimal objective value of the crisp NLFSPP obtained by Mishra and Ota [18] lies in the range of optimal objective values of fuzzy NLFFSPP obtained due to the proposed methods. In example 2, considering NLFFSPP as a crisp model the optimal solution is obtained as 𝑦 1 =0.5852915, 𝑦 2 =0.6997048, 𝑦 3 =0.5540157 and the corresponding optimal objective value is 𝑓 (𝑦) = βˆ’0.7102850.…”
Section: Comparative Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In example 1, considering the crisp model of NLFFSPP in the numerical example, Mishra and Ota [18] obtained the optimal solution as 𝑦 1 =0.6461028, 𝑦 2 =0.7694510 and the corresponding optimal objective value is 𝑓 (𝑦) = βˆ’0.2433155. As this problem is a fuzzy optimization, using the proposed two solution approaches (Method-1 and Method-2) a set of solutions are obtained in Tables 1-4 for 𝑠 ∈ [0, 1] and 𝛼 ∈ [0, 1] respectively.…”
Section: Comparative Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations