2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2005.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signs of sedentism and mobility in an agro-pastoral community during the Levantine Middle Bronze Age: Interpreting site function and occupation strategy at Zahrat adh-Dhra‘ 1 in Jordan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The abandonment of the olive groves indicated in the Kinneret record is consistent with the results by Neumann et al (2007a) based on the Birkat Ram record, which also show reduced human activities on the Golan Heights after the Early Bronze Age. Also, the chronologically well-dated Dead Sea pollen record as well as archaeological and archaeobotanical findings indicate a decline of olive cultivation along with a decrease of settlement density and economic activities in southern Israel by the Late Bronze Age (3,500-3,150 cal bp) (Fall et al 1998;Berelov 2006). Regional differences in timing of the population change cause this difference in date between the Galilee and Dead Sea regions.…”
Section: 000-2300 Cal Bp (Early Bronze To Iron Age)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abandonment of the olive groves indicated in the Kinneret record is consistent with the results by Neumann et al (2007a) based on the Birkat Ram record, which also show reduced human activities on the Golan Heights after the Early Bronze Age. Also, the chronologically well-dated Dead Sea pollen record as well as archaeological and archaeobotanical findings indicate a decline of olive cultivation along with a decrease of settlement density and economic activities in southern Israel by the Late Bronze Age (3,500-3,150 cal bp) (Fall et al 1998;Berelov 2006). Regional differences in timing of the population change cause this difference in date between the Galilee and Dead Sea regions.…”
Section: 000-2300 Cal Bp (Early Bronze To Iron Age)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= .11 when the data are collapsed into two groups, < 1.5 m and > 1.5 m). In both periods there are a few house remains, but the generalized midden deposits within which both houses and pit features occur suggest there was little in the way of formalized spatial segregation of living, work, and trash-disposal areas within these sites, which would otherwise indicate permanent occupation of the degree evidenced by late prehistoric pueblos or other sedentary village sites (see Berelov 2006;Lightfoot 1984;Rocek 1995:224-225). In terms of most indicators of settlement and subsistence, then, the U.S. 70 Late Archaic and Formative-period sites would fall somewhere between highly mobile huntergatherers and fully sedentary farmers.…”
Section: A Case Study From Southern New Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pottery excavated from ZAD 1 conforms with typological parallels from the Levantine Middle Bronze Age, with no material culture evidence indicative of earlier or subsequent periods. More specifically, stylistic distinctions between pottery in lower and upper stratified levels indicated phases of occupation in Middle Bronze I and II (Falconer in Edwards et al 2002a; Berelov 2006a:92, 2006b; Fall et al 2007). Spatial analysis of pottery deposition also suggested multiple phases of occupation in which some structures (e.g., at the northwestern end of ZAD 1) were occupied in Middle Bronze I, while others across the site were occupied in Middle Bronze I and II (Berelov 2006a, 2006b; Fall et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronologically diagnostic pottery from ZAD 1 includes vessel forms most closely paralleled in Middle Bronze I and II assemblages from sites across the Southern Levant (see discussions in Falconer in Edwards et al 2002a; Berelov 2006a:92, 2006b; Fall et al 2007). The ZAD 1 ceramics also have a dearth of transitional Early Bronze IV/Middle Bronze I forms (e.g., as seen in Tell el-Hayyat Phase 5; Falconer and Fall 2006:46–49) and lacks several hallmark Middle Bronze III types altogether (e.g., ovoid cooking pots, highly profiled jar and bowl rims, high-footed bowls or chalices; also seen in Tell el-Hayyat Phases 2 and 1; Falconer and Fall 2006:56–60).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%