2011
DOI: 10.1080/13594320903338884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silence is golden? Characteristics and experiences of self-reported whistleblowers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Mesmer-Magnus and Viswesvaran (2005) found that job level was positively related to both intended and actual whistleblowing. These findings are replicated in recent research: Bjørkelo and colleagues found that respondents holding a leadership position or who were union or Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) representatives were more likely to report wrongdoing at work (Bjørkelo et al 2011). Similarly, Rothwell and Baldwin (2007) found that supervisory status was a consistent predictor of both willingness and frequency of whistleblowing.…”
Section: Control Beliefs and Perceived Behavioral Controlsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For example, Mesmer-Magnus and Viswesvaran (2005) found that job level was positively related to both intended and actual whistleblowing. These findings are replicated in recent research: Bjørkelo and colleagues found that respondents holding a leadership position or who were union or Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) representatives were more likely to report wrongdoing at work (Bjørkelo et al 2011). Similarly, Rothwell and Baldwin (2007) found that supervisory status was a consistent predictor of both willingness and frequency of whistleblowing.…”
Section: Control Beliefs and Perceived Behavioral Controlsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Whether these results primarily are due to the nature of the reaction (formal or informal character) or due to the source of the negative reactions (e.g., CEO, supervisor or colleague) is unknown. What is known is, nevertheless, that repeated negative and retaliatory acts after whistleblowing can be both formal and informal and can be performed by both managers and colleagues (Bjørkelo, Einarsen, Nielsen, & Matthiesen, 2011;Bjørkelo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Whistleblowing and Retaliationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kun hvis dette ikke fører frem med hensyn til de kritikkverdige forholdene, går de videre. Denne fremgangsmåten samstemmer også med norsk og internasjonal forskning på feltet (Bjørkelo, Einarsen, Nielsen, & Matthiesen, 2011;Brown, Moberly, Lewis, & Vandekerckhove, 2014).…”
Section: Anmeldelse Og Kommentarer Til En Svensk Tigerunclassified