2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11192-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silent Sentence Completion Shows Superiority Localizing Wernicke’s Area and Activation Patterns of Distinct Language Paradigms Correlate with Genomics: Prospective Study

Abstract: Preoperative mapping of language areas using fMRI greatly depends on the paradigms used, as different tasks harness distinct capabilities to activate speech processing areas. In this study, we compared the ability of 3 covert speech paradigms: Silent Sentence Completion (SSC), category naming (CAT) and verbal fluency (FAS), in localizing the Wernicke’s area and studied the association between genomic markers and functional activation. Fifteen right-handed healthy volunteers and 35 mixed-handed patients were in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, localization of Wernicke's area using fMRI has been described as challenging due to its variable anatomical location and paradigm inconsistency. [27][28][29][30] In this study, the majority of the raters agreed that there were changes in localization of language areas between the English and non-English fMRI, especially within the posterior language ROI. This was supported by an increased confidence in fMRI language localization by two raters, suggesting the potential of non-English fMRI mapping for improving language localization within the posterior language ROI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, localization of Wernicke's area using fMRI has been described as challenging due to its variable anatomical location and paradigm inconsistency. [27][28][29][30] In this study, the majority of the raters agreed that there were changes in localization of language areas between the English and non-English fMRI, especially within the posterior language ROI. This was supported by an increased confidence in fMRI language localization by two raters, suggesting the potential of non-English fMRI mapping for improving language localization within the posterior language ROI.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In the literature, localization of Wernicke's area using fMRI has been described as challenging due to its variable anatomical location and paradigm inconsistency . In this study, the majority of the raters agreed that there were changes in localization of language areas between the English and non‐English fMRI, especially within the posterior language ROI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This task comprehensively involves many linguistic processes in both comprehension (orthographic processing, word access, grammatical parsing, semantic integration) and production (word search, grammatical inflection in morphologically complex languages such as Russian, phonological encoding and articulation). Empirically, previous works proved sentence completion superior to other tasks in assessing both lateralization and localization of language processing networks (Salek et al, 2017, Połczyńska et al, 2017, Zacà et al, 2012, Barnett et al, 2014, Wilson et al, 2017, Unadkat et al, 2019.…”
Section: Choice Of a Language Task For Fmri Mappingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, we also found ipsilateral STG had decreased FC with contralateral STG, SMG, and ANG, and ipsilateral MTG had decreased FC with contralateral STG and ANG, while contralateral cerebellar crus 1 area had increased FC with ipsilateral STG and MTG in FP group. STG, MTG, SMG, and ANG all belong to the Wernicke area (30). Left SMG and STG are involved in speech processing and the posterior part of left STG and ANG are related to semantic processing, and the middle part of left MTG and anterior part of STG are involved in sentence processing (31).…”
Section: Fp Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%