2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra23157g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silica sulfuric acid: a reusable solid catalyst for the synthesis of N-substituted amides via the Ritter reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected silica sulfuric acid (SSA) as the heterogeneous catalyst for our present investigation based on our earlier work under batch conditions. The catalyst was prepared and characterized using the reported methods, and the acid values of the prepared SSA was determined . The best SSA catalyst we chose was the one with the acid value of 6.5 mEq/g of the catalyst (details are provided inthe Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected silica sulfuric acid (SSA) as the heterogeneous catalyst for our present investigation based on our earlier work under batch conditions. The catalyst was prepared and characterized using the reported methods, and the acid values of the prepared SSA was determined . The best SSA catalyst we chose was the one with the acid value of 6.5 mEq/g of the catalyst (details are provided inthe Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 42 ] By contrast, o ‐aminobenzonitrile was hardly reacting with benzyl alcohol under the same conditions; this might be due to the preferential oxidation of cyanide groups on o ‐aminobenzonitrile, which led to the decreased selectivity of the reaction. [ 43–45 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42] By contrast, oaminobenzonitrile was hardly reacting with benzyl alcohol under the same conditions; this might be due to the preferential oxidation of cyanide groups on oaminobenzonitrile, which led to the decreased selectivity of the reaction. [43][44][45] Distinctly, catalyst recycling was an important indicator of whether it could be industrialized. In view of this, works had been done to explore the reuse performance of CoMoO 4 @C-500.…”
Section: Universality and Recycling Of The Catalystmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include a variety of Lewis and Bronsted acid/reagents such as sulfuric acid, 5,6 Mg(HSO 4 ) 2 , 7 silica-supported Fe(ClO 4 ) 3, 8 trifluoromethane sulfonic acid, 9 trifluoromethane sulfonic anhydride, 10 zeolites, 11 (BF 3 •OEt 2 ), 12 MnO 2 •SiO 2 , 13 bismuth Triflate, 14 DNBSA, 15 Ca(HSO 4 ) 2 , 16 TiCl 4 , 17 P 2 O 5 •SiO 2 , 18 Fe 3+ -K10 Montmorillonite, 19 PMA•SiO 2 , 20 Nafion-H, 21 NaHSO 4 /SiO 2 , 22 and H 2 PW 12 O 40 . 23 In addition to this, various catalytic systems are also reported which include silica sulfuric acid, 24 silica supported sulfonic acid, 25 silica-bonded Npropyl sulphamic acid (SBNPSA), 26 silica boron-sulfuric acid nanoparticles (SBSANs), 27 HClO 4 -functionalized silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles, 28 sulfated tungstate, 29 * For correspondence alumina-methanesulfonic acid (AMA), 30 nanocat-Fe-OSO 3 H, 31 35 Al(HSO 4 ) 3 , 2 ionic liquids, 36 iodine, 37 and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone-supported boron trifluoride. 38 However, these reagents and catalytic systems suffer from one of the following limitations such as the use of expensive and toxic reagents/catalysts, limited availability of reagent, hygroscopicity as well as instability of the reagents, use of strong protic media, harsh reaction condition, long reaction time, low yield and tedious workup procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%