2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2006
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2006.354170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon Detectors for Low Energy Particle Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy threshold is determined by thickness of the detector contacts and the intrinsic detector capacitance. According to Tindall et al [], “The electric field does not penetrate the contact fully and hence electron hole pairs created in this field free region have a significant probability of recombining before they can be collected. Incident particles that are not energetic enough to enter the active region of the device will not be detected.…”
Section: Detectors and Overall Geometric Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The energy threshold is determined by thickness of the detector contacts and the intrinsic detector capacitance. According to Tindall et al [], “The electric field does not penetrate the contact fully and hence electron hole pairs created in this field free region have a significant probability of recombining before they can be collected. Incident particles that are not energetic enough to enter the active region of the device will not be detected.…”
Section: Detectors and Overall Geometric Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incident particles that are not energetic enough to enter the active region of the device will not be detected. For silicon detectors with contacts that have been fabricated using standard ion implantation techniques the junction depth has been reported to be about 3000 Å, a window thickness corresponding to about a 30 keV threshold for protons (20 keV for electrons).” However, recent advances in lowering the energy threshold for SSSDs now make it possible to construct an array of thin‐contact, passively cooled, solid‐state detector pixels with a lower energy threshold of only 2 keV for electrons [ Tindall et al , ]. Suggested for use in plasma instruments by Ritzau et al [] who demonstrated their suitability in laboratory experiments, thin‐contact SSSD detectors are now in use in space in the In‐situ Measurements of Particles And CME Transients SupraThermal Electron instrument on the STEREO mission [ Lin et al , ], in the Solid State Telescopes on the THEMIS mission [ Angelopoulos , ], and in the STEIN instrument on the CINEMA spacecraft as noted previously.…”
Section: Detectors and Overall Geometric Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…STE consists of arrays of small, low capacitance, cooled SSDs ( Fig. 1), fabricated with an unusually thin window dead layer (Tindall et al 2008), so <∼2 keV electrons can penetrate and be detected. The SSDs are surrounded by a guard ring and passively cooled to ∼−30 to −90°C to minimize leakage current, and coupled to state-of-the-art, cooled FET, pulse-reset preamp-shaping electronics to obtain an electronic threshold of ∼1.5 keV.…”
Section: Instrument Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Standard types of electron sources are typically used for these purposes, although they often have limitations that increase their complexity for use or constrain their utility. For example, beta sources generate electrons from radioactive decay, are readily available, and provide stable, predictable electron fluxes; however, they generate a broad spectrum of electron energies, are potentially hazardous, are often accompanied by gamma ray emission, and are limited in flux and energy range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%