2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2263472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon photonics and challenges for fabrication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the refractive index of α-Si is much higher than SiO2, the variation in α-Si thickness (𝑡𝑡 1 ) would expectedly affects the coupling performance more than the variations in vertical gap between Si3N4 and α-Si (𝑔𝑔 1 ) and vertical gap between α-Si and GeSi (𝑔𝑔 2 ) which are made of SiO2. Although challenging, these variations can be considered within the homogenous performance recently obtained from advanced CMOS process technology for sub-wavelength photonic structures on a Si wafer [14,[42][43][44]. The effects of variation in α-Si taper tip width (𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 ), and GeSi taper tip width (𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 ) are also considered in Fig.…”
Section: Coupling Performance: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the refractive index of α-Si is much higher than SiO2, the variation in α-Si thickness (𝑡𝑡 1 ) would expectedly affects the coupling performance more than the variations in vertical gap between Si3N4 and α-Si (𝑔𝑔 1 ) and vertical gap between α-Si and GeSi (𝑔𝑔 2 ) which are made of SiO2. Although challenging, these variations can be considered within the homogenous performance recently obtained from advanced CMOS process technology for sub-wavelength photonic structures on a Si wafer [14,[42][43][44]. The effects of variation in α-Si taper tip width (𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 ), and GeSi taper tip width (𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 ) are also considered in Fig.…”
Section: Coupling Performance: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(a), the responsivity values of more than 0.35 A/W can be maintained as long as the vertical position misalignment is within ± 50 nm. This tolerance can be considered relatively relaxed in view of the recent progress in advanced CMOS processing and manufacturing of photonic structures on a largescale wafer substrate [53][54][55]. It can be also mentioned that the responsivity values are significantly more sensitive to the positive variation of ∆𝑍 than the negative one.…”
Section: > Replace This Line With Your Manuscript Id Number (Double-c...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome these limitations, immersion DUV lithography has been increasingly investigated for the fabrication of photonic devices. Immersion DUV lithography is compatible with high-volume production and, compared to dry lithography, allows to achieve a three-fold improvement in device size reproducibility, with one-sigma variations below 1% across the wafer, and an almost two times reduction of line edge roughness [24,25]. These advantages result in a better on-wafer uniformity of the device performance, reduced scattering, and lower phase errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%