2014
DOI: 10.1021/am505566m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicone Surface with Drug Nanodepots for Medical Devices

Abstract: An ideal surface of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) medical devices requires sustained drug release to combat various tissue responses and infection. At present, a noncovalent surface coating with drug molecules using binders possesses a detachment problem, while covalently linking drug molecules to the surface provides no releasable drug. Here, a platform that allows the deposition of diverse drugs onto the PDMS surface in an adequate quantity with reliable attachment and a sustained-release character is demons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probe tip material, the conduit tubes, and the chemical used were PDMS, PTFE, and water, respectively. PDMS and PTFE are widely recognized as biocompatible materials and have a long history of utilization in medical devices including catheters and long-term implants (37). Our experiments demonstrate that the low volume (10 ÎŒl or less) of high-purity water used caused no effect to the tissues analyzed in vivo and ex vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probe tip material, the conduit tubes, and the chemical used were PDMS, PTFE, and water, respectively. PDMS and PTFE are widely recognized as biocompatible materials and have a long history of utilization in medical devices including catheters and long-term implants (37). Our experiments demonstrate that the low volume (10 ÎŒl or less) of high-purity water used caused no effect to the tissues analyzed in vivo and ex vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most in vitro antimicrobial tests use a static “closed” testing system,[9b,34b,42] whereas in vivo the implant has to face a dynamic, continuously changing, mechanically unstable, and predominantly fluid environment. [9b,12,34a,43] To date, there is no widely accepted methodology available to precisely and reproducibly evaluate the antimicrobial efficiency of new nano‐based solutions proposed for antimicrobial surfaces . In this respect, controlled and standardized testing conditions that closely mimic the human in vivo environment need to be developed for the evaluation of antimicrobial efficiency.…”
Section: Key Features For the Design Of Efficient Antimicrobial Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large variety of surfaces are obtained, depending on the modification of the solid support (physical, chemical, or both) and the supplementary association with antibacterial components (bio‐, synthetic molecules, membranes, and assemblies). Antibacterial surfaces based on nanoscience approaches include: i) hydrogels or hydrogel‐like films with temporal release of active agents, ii) solid supports decorated with: polymer brushes, nanoparticles, nanocarriers, nanostructures, and nanoreactors, which are catalytically active nanocompartments, which produce reactive agents in situ, and iii) micro‐ and nanopatterned surface structures . Nanoscience‐based strategies to design antimicrobial surfaces have the advantage of being bottom‐up approaches, which allow combination of different biosynthetic, and synthetic compounds and assemblies at molecular level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IOL can, however, allow adhesion of many kinds of bacteria and lead to post-operative infections with catastrophic effects in some patients. LbL nanocoating of the lenses with hyaluronic and chitosan had significant anti-adhesion and bactericidal effects that reduced the risk of postoperative infections [ 83 , 84 ].…”
Section: What Can Lbl Nanocoating Contribute To the Prevention Of mentioning
confidence: 99%