2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0992-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicone wristbands compared with traditional polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure assessment methods

Abstract: Currently there is a lack of inexpensive, easy-to-use technology to evaluate human exposure to environmental chemicals, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This is the first study in which silicone wristbands were deployed alongside two traditional personal PAH exposure assessment methods: active air monitoring with samplers (i.e., polyurethane foam (PUF) and filter) housed in backpacks, and biological sampling with urine. We demonstrate that wristbands worn for 48 h in a non-occupational settin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
118
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
118
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The PAH levels observed here (76.2 to 1,240 ng/wristband) were much lower than those reported in silicone wristbands worn by hot asphalt roofers (230 to 4,600 ng/wristband) [5], suggesting higher PAH exposure in occupational settings. Median phenanthrene and fluorene levels (89.3 and 24.3 ng/wristband, respectively) measured in this study were lower than those reported in wristbands worn by pregnant women in New York City (228 and 74 ng/wristband, respectively) [11], which could be related to higher traffic and combustion sources in New York City than in Bloomington, Indiana.…”
Section: Application To Deployed Wristband Samplescontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PAH levels observed here (76.2 to 1,240 ng/wristband) were much lower than those reported in silicone wristbands worn by hot asphalt roofers (230 to 4,600 ng/wristband) [5], suggesting higher PAH exposure in occupational settings. Median phenanthrene and fluorene levels (89.3 and 24.3 ng/wristband, respectively) measured in this study were lower than those reported in wristbands worn by pregnant women in New York City (228 and 74 ng/wristband, respectively) [11], which could be related to higher traffic and combustion sources in New York City than in Bloomington, Indiana.…”
Section: Application To Deployed Wristband Samplescontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…These studies have demonstrated that a commercial silicone wristband, worn by study participants, offers a non-invasive and simple way to quantify personal exposure to multiple chemicals from multiple microenvironments and within a multiday time period. Further, several studies have found significant correlations between the mass of chemicals accumulated on the wristband and biomarkers of internal exposure measured in blood or urine [11][12][13]. This sampling method opens a wide range of opportunities for larger scale exposure monitoring studies, especially in vulnerable populations such as children, due to its noninvasiveness (and thus low rejection rates of subject participation), simplicity, and cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the sampler to determine the correct time zone and allows the research team to see that the sampler has been activated. Each participant also puts on the first of three passive sampling wristbands (24hourwristbands.com, Houston, Texas), to collect 1 month of integrated exposure to over 1500 chemicals . After setting up the sampler and putting on the wristband, the participant competes a survey in the smartphone application to alert the study team that all Day 1 items have been successfully completed.…”
Section: The Recap Study: a Case Study In Using In Home Air Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The team then compared the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons sampled by the wristbands with metabolites in the women's urine that the body produces in an attempt to detoxify these chemicals. In May 2018, the team reported correlations between exposure data and these metabolite biomarkers (15). But even in this case, the exact risk these chemicals pose to the participants' health is unclear.…”
Section: From Exposure To Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%