Crime control theater (CCT) describes legal actions (e.g., policies) that appear to address crime but are sometimes ineffective and can potentially have unintended negative consequences. Four key criteria of CCT include reactionary response to moral panic, unquestioned acceptance and promotion, appeal to mythic narratives, and empirical failure. Social psychological phenomenon such as counterfactual thinking, emotions, and social cognition potentially influence individuals' support for CCT policies. A variety of legal actions-including AMBER Alerts, sex offender registration laws, 3-strikes laws, safe haven laws, and raids on the FLDS religious compounds-can be classified as crime control theater. Moreover, overselling these legal actions could be associated with a variety of potential dangers. For instance, the danger of overselling sex offender registration laws is that people focus on stereotypical sexual abuse (e.g., abuse committed by strangers) and underestimate the greater risk of sexual abuse among acquaintances. This article outlines the history of CCT, identifies specific legal actions that can be classified as CCT, identifies psychological phenomenon that might affect support for CCT policies, illustrates the dangers of overselling these legal actions, offers recommendations to avoid or improve theatrical legal actions, and offers future directions for researchers. This article concludes with an introduction to the special journal section examining the science of CCT.