2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-016-1715-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIM Life: a new surgical simulation device using a human perfused cadaver

Abstract: The model involved a cadaver, connected to a specific device that permits beating circulation and artificial respiration. The demonstration contributed to teaching small groups of up to four participants and was reproducible over 24 months of courses. Anatomic correlation, realism, and learning experience were highly rated by users CONCLUSION: This model for surgical simulation in both open and laparoscopic surgery was found to be realistic, available to assessed objectively performance in a pedagogic program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation with three-dimensional (3D) print models may prove to be a major advantage in congenital cardiac surgery simulation, where trainees are not likely to see all of the extensive variations in the anatomy of congenital heart disease during training ( While cadaveric simulation curriculums have most commonly been incorporated into training in the neurosurgical, general surgical, orthopedic surgical, and trauma surgical specialties, interest in cadaveric simulation for application in teaching basic core surgical skills, common operative procedures, and advanced skills and operative procedures in cardiothoracic surgery as an adjunct to traditional operative training is becoming more prominent (Fig. 2) (Aboud et al, 2011;Inboriboon and Lumlertgul, 2013;Sharma et al, 2013;Massey et al, 2014;Bouma et al, 2015Bouma et al, , 2017Carey et al, 2015;Greene et al, 2015;Mavroudis et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016;Delpech et al, 2017;Faure et al, 2017;Karras et al, 2017;McLeod et al, 2017;Nesbitt et al, 2018a, b;Sarkar et al, 2018). Cadaveric models provide greater anatomical authenticity, which may be more advantageous for simulation of complex procedures that require greater anatomic accuracy for more advanced learners, full procedural simulations, anatomic dissection, and experience in less familiar surgical exposures (Kuhls et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulation with three-dimensional (3D) print models may prove to be a major advantage in congenital cardiac surgery simulation, where trainees are not likely to see all of the extensive variations in the anatomy of congenital heart disease during training ( While cadaveric simulation curriculums have most commonly been incorporated into training in the neurosurgical, general surgical, orthopedic surgical, and trauma surgical specialties, interest in cadaveric simulation for application in teaching basic core surgical skills, common operative procedures, and advanced skills and operative procedures in cardiothoracic surgery as an adjunct to traditional operative training is becoming more prominent (Fig. 2) (Aboud et al, 2011;Inboriboon and Lumlertgul, 2013;Sharma et al, 2013;Massey et al, 2014;Bouma et al, 2015Bouma et al, , 2017Carey et al, 2015;Greene et al, 2015;Mavroudis et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016;Delpech et al, 2017;Faure et al, 2017;Karras et al, 2017;McLeod et al, 2017;Nesbitt et al, 2018a, b;Sarkar et al, 2018). Cadaveric models provide greater anatomical authenticity, which may be more advantageous for simulation of complex procedures that require greater anatomic accuracy for more advanced learners, full procedural simulations, anatomic dissection, and experience in less familiar surgical exposures (Kuhls et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its structural fidelity, modifications to the cadaver model can enhance its physiologic realism, including simulated beating heart, valve motion, circulation, and ventilation ( Fig. 3) (Bouma et al, 2015(Bouma et al, , 2017Carey et al, 2015;Greene et al, 2015;Delpech et al, 2017;Faure et al, 2017;Karras et al, 2017, McLeod et al, 2017. Faure and colleagues created an enhanced cadaveric model that is perfused, pulsatile, and ventilated; a controlled perfusion device is capable of adjusting the flow rate and ventilation frequency via manual adjustment to provide an adaptive response consistent with the simulated clinical situation (Delpech et al, 2017;Faure et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no reason for virtual and additive manufacturing technologies to compete with cadaveric simulation, considering that a combination of the two can open new horizons of surgical training and pre-operative preparation. Other emerging technologies will also allow for the accurate recreation of breathing movements and circulation [28,29], the lack of which was mentioned in one of the reviews as a shortcoming of cadaveric simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced imaging techniques (eg, Single‐Photon Emission Computed Tomography, SPECT) are being used recently to carry out experimental measurements, although their performance is limited because they cannot clearly identify the airway level at which particles are deposited. Another experimental solution can be the use of cadavers or laboratory models of lungs 13 . The problem with these methods is that an expensive equipment is usually required in order to visualize the particles and additionally, tests must be performed sequentially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%