2017
DOI: 10.3390/toxins9070230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SiMa Cells for a Serotype Specific and Sensitive Cell-Based Neutralization Test for Botulinum Toxin A and E

Abstract: Botulinum toxins (BoNTs), of which there are seven serotypes, are among the most potent neurotoxins, with serotypes A, B and E causing human botulism. Antitoxins form the first line of treatment for botulism, and functional, highly sensitive in vitro methods for toxin neutralization are needed to replace the current in vivo methods used for determination of antitoxin potency. In this preliminary proof of concept study, we report the development of a neutralization test using the neuroblastoma SiMa cell line. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous studies have used cell-based assays for in vitro quantification of neutralizing antibodies (Bak et al, 2017;Hall et al, 2004;Nuss et al, 2010;Pellett et al, 2007;Yadirgi et al, 2017). However, the vast majority of the in vitro values were not compared to respective PMNA data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several previous studies have used cell-based assays for in vitro quantification of neutralizing antibodies (Bak et al, 2017;Hall et al, 2004;Nuss et al, 2010;Pellett et al, 2007;Yadirgi et al, 2017). However, the vast majority of the in vitro values were not compared to respective PMNA data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the vast majority of the in vitro values were not compared to respective PMNA data. To date, only one cell-based study has attempted to assess the in vitro neutralizing activity of type E botulinum antitoxins with respect to the PMNA, and its evaluation was limited since the in vivo potency was not precisely defined but was based on an assumed broad range (>50 IU/mL, stated by the antitoxin manufacturer) (Bak et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our NanoLuc-VAMP2 SiMa neuroblastoma assay far exceeds the rat spinal cord cell sensitivity using a very simple 3-day differentiation protocol. It appears that the differentiated SiMa neuroblastoma cells are sensitive to BoNTs ( Fernández-Salas et al, 2012 ; Rust et al, 2016 ; Bak et al, 2017 ) due to the high level of expression of neuron-specific GT1b ganglioside ( Figure 1D ) which is essential for the initial binding of the toxins ( Montecucco and Schiavo, 1994 ; Binz and Rummel, 2009 ). If needed, sensitivity could be improved further by stably transfecting into the NanoLuc-VAMP2 SiMa neuroblastoma cells the mouse synaptotagmin 2 which has 10 times higher affinity to BoNT/B compared to human synaptotagmin ( Strotmeier et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fetweh H. Al-Saleem, Rashmi Sharma, Scott K. Dessain, and their co-workers from the United States of America, presented the development of a fusion protein for red blood cell adherence of immune complexes containing BoNT, to improve neutralization and macrophage uptake [13]. Nicola Bak, Dorothea Sesardic, and their team from the United Kingdom, reported on the application of SiMa cells for cell-based neutralization test for BoNT/A and BoNT/E [14]. On the vaccine development side, Robert P. Webb, Theresa J. Smith, and their team from USAMRIID, reported on the production of non-toxic holoproteins and recombinant BoNT toxin domain subunits as vaccine candidates against multiple serotypes [15], Denis Y. Otaka, Felipe M. Salvarani, and their team from Brazil, reported on the humoral response of buffalos to a recombinant vaccine against BoNT/C and D [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%