2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59725-2_73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIMBA: Specific Identity Markers for Bone Age Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We included gender and bone age information for each individual in the annotation file of the Sekisui database. In addition, because the conversion of skeletal maturity scores to bone age is supported by the bone age scale, we used the Sekisui database to train and test the BoNet, 37 SIMBA, 38 Yitu‐AICARE, 39 and SMANet 40 models. The models that performed best on the validation set were used for comparison experiments.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included gender and bone age information for each individual in the annotation file of the Sekisui database. In addition, because the conversion of skeletal maturity scores to bone age is supported by the bone age scale, we used the Sekisui database to train and test the BoNet, 37 SIMBA, 38 Yitu‐AICARE, 39 and SMANet 40 models. The models that performed best on the validation set were used for comparison experiments.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mean error of six months was achieved in the RSNA testing set. González et al [37] fused information from identity markers with visual features from raw hand bone X-rays and used this representation to estimate the relative bone age with an MAE of 5.47 months. Liu et al [38] applied ranked learning for the BAA and used VGG-U-Net to segment the hand and wrist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larson [36] Improved ResNet-50 6.0 González [37] Identity label + Inception-V3 5.47 Liu [38] Ranked learning + VGG-U-Net + GAN 6.05 Halabi [39] Sex + Inception v3 + Dense 4.2, 4.4, 4.5 (top3) Iglovikov [14] U-Net + key point detection 4.97 Koitka [40] Faster-RCNN + sex regression network 4.56 Liu [41] One-stage attention + age recognition network 4.38 Chen [42] Attention + joint age distribution learning 4.4 Ours Two-stage + alignment + sex token 4.586…”
Section: Methods Mae (Months)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results demonstrated an average variation between automated and manual assessments of approximately 0.8 years. Recently, Cristina et al [ 20 ] proposed a specific identity labels-based bone age assessment (SIMBA) model, which involved the gender as well as the age of patients. Different from the other bone age assessment methods, this model calculates the relative bone age according to the difference between practical age and bone age.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results demonstrated an average variation between automated and manual assessments of approximately 0.8 years. Recently, Cristina et al [20] The third category adopts a ROI-based method with the multi-stage structure to predict bone age, which extracts local information and ultimately predicts bone age by introducing prior knowledge for image segmentation or hand bone ROIs detection. For instance, Escobar et al [21] proposed the Bonet which introduced a hand detection module and pose estimation module to the BBA system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%