2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similar ex vivo expansion and post-irradiation regenerative potential of juvenile and aged salivary gland stem cells

Abstract: Aged SGSCs although reduced in number are in vitro indistinguishable from young SGSCs and could potentially be used to ameliorate age- or treatment related salivary gland dysfunction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acknowledging caveats of the different mouse models used, these data suggest firstly that human salisphere cells hold great therapeutic promise for rescue of hyposalivation and secondly that purification of a potent stem cell subset from the heterogeneous salisphere population may enhance hyposalivation recovery. It should be noted, however, that the frequency of c‐Kit + cells in primary cultures is extremely low, and appears even to decrease with age, in agreement with our previous studies showing decrease in overall primary salisphere yield with age . These data suggest that other, more abundant stem cell marker proteins may be more suitable (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Acknowledging caveats of the different mouse models used, these data suggest firstly that human salisphere cells hold great therapeutic promise for rescue of hyposalivation and secondly that purification of a potent stem cell subset from the heterogeneous salisphere population may enhance hyposalivation recovery. It should be noted, however, that the frequency of c‐Kit + cells in primary cultures is extremely low, and appears even to decrease with age, in agreement with our previous studies showing decrease in overall primary salisphere yield with age . These data suggest that other, more abundant stem cell marker proteins may be more suitable (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…E). Further analysis demonstrated a moderate upregulation of soluble factors associated with SG branching and development (transforming growth factor (TGF)b1, TGFb3, bone morphogenetic protein1) , SG stem cell maintenance (insulin growth factor, EGF) (Supplementary Information Fig. S9B), and SG functionality (α‐amylase, AQP‐1, DCPP2, DCPP3, PSP) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the discovery that single stem cells form spheres or aggregates through proliferation and differentiation, “sphere” cultures have been widely used for culture of intestine, liver, mammary gland, and neural tissue, and have also been adapted for salivary glands (Cao et al, 2011; Feng et al, 2009; Ishiguro et al, 2017; Lathia, Mack, Mulkearns-Hubert, Valentim, & Rich, 2015; Lombaert, Brunsting, Wierenga, Faber, et al, 2008; Maimets, Bron, de Haan, van Os, & Coppes, 2015; Manuel Iglesias et al, 2013; Min, Lee, Bak, & Kim, 2015; Nanduri et al, 2011; Reynolds & Weiss, 1992; Shubin, Felong, Graunke, Ovitt, & Benoit, 2015; Smart et al, 2013). Using rigorous techniques, sphere culture enables isolation and expansion of clonogenic stem/progenitor cell populations with growth only through proliferation (Chen et al, 2012; Reynolds & Weiss, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For effective investigations, it is important to perform consistent, clean dissections of the major salivary glands. Clean and efficient gland isolation is critical for cultures derived from primary cells that are mechanically and enzymatically dissociated from the major salivary glands 30,31 , and for histologic and immunohistochemical preparations. Moreover, when staining for secreted proteins in gland tissue sections, it is critical to consider and control for the likely depletion of these products following stimulated saliva collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%