2021
DOI: 10.3390/f12030353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarities and Differences among Soil Fungal Assemblages in Managed Forests and Formerly Managed Forest Reserves

Abstract: Unlike the numerous works concerning the effect of management on the forest mycobiome, only a few studies have addressed how fungi from different trophic groups recover from natural and anthropogenic disturbances and develop structural features typical of unmanaged old-growth forests. Our objective is to compare the soil fungal assemblages represented by different functional/trophic groups in protected and managed stands located in European mixed forests dominated by Scots pine. Fungal communities were analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(165 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For one assemblage of ECM except for unknown fungi, the similarity of ECM communities showed the highest value in the shiro− soils at the two sites (0.857). In a previous study by Kujawska et al [42], the re-assembly of the soil fungal community at the trophic level could be a strong stochastic component to overcome a general reduction in the similarity of the community composition between different regions.…”
Section: Differences Between Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For one assemblage of ECM except for unknown fungi, the similarity of ECM communities showed the highest value in the shiro− soils at the two sites (0.857). In a previous study by Kujawska et al [42], the re-assembly of the soil fungal community at the trophic level could be a strong stochastic component to overcome a general reduction in the similarity of the community composition between different regions.…”
Section: Differences Between Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ECM fungi of generas Tylospora, Astraeus, Sistotrema, Russula, Sebacina, and Tomentella thatwere also detected in a coastal pine forest in the eastern region of Korea, were abundantly detected in the shiro− soil at the Bonghwa site [38][39][40][41]. In other fungi assemblages, there are a few fungal genera in the form of saprotrophic fungi groups such as Cladophialophora, penicillium, unidentified Hyaloscyphaceae, and Mortierella [42]. The fungal communities, except for Tricholoma and other ECMs, have lower proportions in the shiro+ soils than those in the shiro− soils at the two sites (B_shiro+.…”
Section: Distinct Fungal Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These techniques allow the analysis of fungal communities in forest ecosystems composed of functionally distinct trophic groups represented by symbiotrophic (mycorrhizal fungi, lichens, endophytes), pathotrophic and saprotrophic fungi [24]. Recent research using the NGS technique addresses, among other things, changes in soil fungal community depending on the functional group and the type of forest disturbance [29], the importance of environmental factors (weather and climatic factors) [30] and anthropogenic factors (forest management) on fungal community changes [31]. Applying the NGS technique to a large-scale analysis of the soil fungal community at geographically separated forest sites dominated by the same tree species could help to clarify the relative contribution of geographical location and soil chemical parameters to soil fungal community structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%