2013 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies 2013
DOI: 10.1109/acsat.2013.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarities and Dissimilarities between Character Frequencies of Written Text of Melayu, English, and Indonesian Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time interval between element, character and word is set as 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 s respectivel The code length is based on the frequency of the occurrence of a particular character in the Englis language. The frequency of occurrence of English characters are extracted from [38] which is base on high samples of English words. The higher frequency alphabets get shorter sequences wherea code length is increased as the frequency of occurrence is decreased.…”
Section: Cetacean Morse Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time interval between element, character and word is set as 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5 s respectivel The code length is based on the frequency of the occurrence of a particular character in the Englis language. The frequency of occurrence of English characters are extracted from [38] which is base on high samples of English words. The higher frequency alphabets get shorter sequences wherea code length is increased as the frequency of occurrence is decreased.…”
Section: Cetacean Morse Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the polynomial count is within a certain range, then the character label corresponding to that range is the result of the identification and evaluation of the polynomial need not be continued. To test the capability of the identification technique, we used the frequency of the occurrence of letters in Indonesian, Malay, and English documents from Shah et al [28]. Figure 5 shows that the use of a double-track approach provides a smaller percentage of computed computations compared to a single-track approach.…”
Section: B Case Study 2: Dot Matrix Character Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%