2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarities and dissimilarities between the EU agricultural and rural development model and Romanian agriculture. Challenges and perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the socialist regime, the state ownership of all goods [100] and the massive industrialization [101] were not in favor of entrepreneurship in rural areas. After the instauration of the democracy in Romania, the economic restructuring and the change in societal perceptions have reaffirmed the role of rural activities in the development of the country [102]. As a consequence, including agritourism entrepreneurship is recently considered a viable option for the sustainable growth of the regions and, after the accession of Romania to the European Union, the financing through structural funds also facilitated this type of business initiatives.…”
Section: Database and Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the socialist regime, the state ownership of all goods [100] and the massive industrialization [101] were not in favor of entrepreneurship in rural areas. After the instauration of the democracy in Romania, the economic restructuring and the change in societal perceptions have reaffirmed the role of rural activities in the development of the country [102]. As a consequence, including agritourism entrepreneurship is recently considered a viable option for the sustainable growth of the regions and, after the accession of Romania to the European Union, the financing through structural funds also facilitated this type of business initiatives.…”
Section: Database and Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for Poland and Slovenia, the two countries that had a consolidated and advantageous farm structure to start from, factors such as different agricultural policy frameworks, restrictive land policies, uneven CAP support and supplement payments, increasing competition with limited domestic market capacity to withstand such strains, negativist attitudes regarding the attractiveness of the economic sector, and the degree of investments (see detailed data in Jambor, 2009, 2013;Ciutacu et al, 2015) seemed to impact country performances and created different outcomes. In the case of Bulgaria and Romania, for example, even if pre-accession (PHARE, ISPA, SAPHARD) and post-accession funds were significant, they struggled to keep up with disbursements as seen in other CEE countries (Paliova and Lybek, 2014).…”
Section: Geographic Area Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further reasons, such as redistribution of labor to other economic branches -a long-time process going back to 1950s, and sustained migration to urban areas, followed by EU labor migration after EU accession, further contributed to the creation of a "deeply imbalanced, dysfunctional, and non-competitive" agricultural sector (Ciutacu et al, 2015) in countries unable to create a successful transition and implementation framework.…”
Section: Geographic Area Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although during the fourteen years of continuous transition Romania succeeded, after a period of more than seventeen years, to integrate into the European economic and social space, there are still imbalances in the national economy and the economic performance is modest. From a sectorial perspective, agriculture, although significantly reduced its contribution to GDP (Global Domestic Product), continued to influence significantly the macroeconomic results as it was remarked in some studies as (Ciutacu et al, 2014;Tegledi, 2011;Done et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%