1987
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80830-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarities between a predicted secondary structure for the M1 RNA ribozyme and the tRNA binding center of 16 S rRNA from E. coli

Abstract: We propose a new model for the secondary structure of the M ! RNA component of E. coli RNase P which is based on significant sequence homologies with parts of the E. coli 16 S rRNA. A large domain of the new model resembles closely the secondary structure of the tRNA binding center of 16 S rRNA. We suggest that this domain of M 1 RNA when functioning as a ribozyme binds the mature part of the precursor tRNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that a similar mechanism is used by rRNA and RNase P RNA for recognition of tRNAs [14]. This suggestion is based on similarities between the secondary structure of 16 S rRNA and a proposed secondary structure for M1 RNA [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been proposed that a similar mechanism is used by rRNA and RNase P RNA for recognition of tRNAs [14]. This suggestion is based on similarities between the secondary structure of 16 S rRNA and a proposed secondary structure for M1 RNA [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that a similar mechanism is used by rRNA and RNase P RNA for recognition of tRNAs [14]. This suggestion is based on similarities between the secondary structure of 16 S rRNA and a proposed secondary structure for M1 RNA [14]. However, these similarities are not supported by other models of the secondary structure of M1 RNA [15,16], although no extensive comparison of the primary and secondary structure between RNase P RNA and rRNAs has been made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In procaryotes, both the RNA and protein components of the ribonucleoprotein enzymes are required for in vivo activity (15,27,29,33,43,49,57,58), but the RNA component alone is capable of efficiently catalyzing the correct reaction under some conditions in vitro (3,18,21,22,52). Extensive phylogenetic sequence comparisons of these RNAs (30), combined with folding energy calculations and cleavage sensitivity studies (6,19,51,52), suggest a conserved, highly ordered secondary structure. Most if not all of the key contacts with the substrates depend on this structure, with the protein contributing to efficiency through secondary effects such as charge shielding between RNA chain phosphate backbones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although temperature-sensitive mutations in these individual components have shown that both are required for RNase P activity in vivo (24,25,31,38,41,46,47), each RNA component alone can recognize and cleave substrates under some conditions in vitro (2,16,19,20,44). The enzymic RNAs can form extensively base-paired secondary structures as judged by theoretical calculations and cleavage sensitivity structure analyses (3,17,43,44). Extensive phylogenetic sequence comparisons among the bacterial RNAs suggest several short domains of conserved sequences and a conserved secondary structure (26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%