2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10058-020-00233-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarities in axiomatizations: equal surplus division value and first-price auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separatorization of a player refers to the complete loss of productive potential of cooperation, in the sense that the worth of any coalition containing this player equals the sum of the stand-alone worths of the players in this coalition, while the worth of any coalition without her remains unchanged. This operation is in line with 'veto-ification' introduced in van den Brink and Funaki (2009), dummification introduced in Béal et al (2018), and nullification studied in Béal et al (2016), Ferrières (2017), Kongo (2018Kongo ( , 2019Kongo ( , 2020. The difference among them lies in which role that a player acts as.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Separatorization of a player refers to the complete loss of productive potential of cooperation, in the sense that the worth of any coalition containing this player equals the sum of the stand-alone worths of the players in this coalition, while the worth of any coalition without her remains unchanged. This operation is in line with 'veto-ification' introduced in van den Brink and Funaki (2009), dummification introduced in Béal et al (2018), and nullification studied in Béal et al (2016), Ferrières (2017), Kongo (2018Kongo ( , 2019Kongo ( , 2020. The difference among them lies in which role that a player acts as.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%