2015
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.20.8.086012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity analysis of functional connectivity with functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Abstract: One of the remaining challenges in functional connectivity (FC) studies is investigation of the temporal variability of FC networks. Recent studies focusing on the dynamic FC mostly use functional magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging tool to investigate the temporal variability of FC. We attempted to quantify this variability via analyzing the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals, which were recorded from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of 12 healthy subjects during a Stroop test. Mutual infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have demonstrated that fNIRS is a suitable tool to evaluate brain functional connectivity [15][16][17][18]. Besides supporting the feasibility of fNIRS for the study of meaningful functional connectivity variations, these previous findings also suggest the possibility of assessing individual connetome profiles [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Several studies have demonstrated that fNIRS is a suitable tool to evaluate brain functional connectivity [15][16][17][18]. Besides supporting the feasibility of fNIRS for the study of meaningful functional connectivity variations, these previous findings also suggest the possibility of assessing individual connetome profiles [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…CBF has been dynamically measured in the resting state, and fluctuates in a similar manner to BOLD (Chen et al, 2015b; Tak et al, 2014), shows stronger coupling to BOLD in networks (using static rsfMRI methods) (Liang et al, 2013; Tak et al, 2014), and coupling between CBF and functional connectivity strength may be modulated by tasks similar to dynamic rsfMRI (as shown in the top section of Table 1) (Tak et al, 2015). Measuring CBF and CMRO 2 using NIRS, functional dynamics can be observed during tasks (Dalmis and Akin, 2015; Harrivel et al, 2016) and at rest using a sliding window approach similar to dynamic rsfMRI (Li et al, 2015b). Dynamic measurements of CBV also show large-scale waves similar to BOLD, though at a different peak frequency (Magnuson et al, 2010).…”
Section: 3 Dynamic Rsfmri Correlates With Neural and Metabolic Actimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parts of these data were published by our group and coworkers. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Consents were obtained from all subjects and they were all informed about the study before the experiment. Subjects were seated in a dimly illuminated insulated room and they were told to look at a computer screen placed in front of them.…”
Section: Subjects and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%