1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0147-1767(96)00016-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity and attraction among majority and minority groups in a multicultural context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, individuals who are more involved in their ethnic culture may behave publicly in ways (e.g., style of dress, language) that members of the majority culture find unusual or off-putting. As a result, majority group members may avoid interactions with them (e.g., Osbeck, Moghaddam, & Perreault, 1997).…”
Section: Ethnic Identification and Amount Of Contact With Members Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, individuals who are more involved in their ethnic culture may behave publicly in ways (e.g., style of dress, language) that members of the majority culture find unusual or off-putting. As a result, majority group members may avoid interactions with them (e.g., Osbeck, Moghaddam, & Perreault, 1997).…”
Section: Ethnic Identification and Amount Of Contact With Members Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that individuals "like" others that are perceived to be similar to themselves. The similarity-attraction hypothesis has received much support at the interpersonal and intergroup levels~Byrne, 1971; Byrne, Clore, & Smeaton, 1986;Levine & Campbell, 1972;Osbeck, Moghaddam, & Perreault, 1997;Triandis, 1971!. To the extent that members of society experience xenophobia toward others perceived to be foreign, they will view less acculturated individuals as dissimilar to themselves.…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of high-status groups have access to antagonistic, normative, and ideologic intergroup representations that maintain and reinforce their privileged position by means of conventional processes of symbolic influence (Lorenzi-Cioldi & Clémence, 2001;Staerklé, Clémence & Spini, 2011). The fear of losing status would lead these members to form relationships only with those outgroup members who are perceived to be more socially desirable, similar, or less vilified (Osbeck & Moghaddam, 1997).…”
Section: *) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%