Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1389449.1389472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity-based reasoning in qualified logic programming

Abstract: Similarity-based Logic Programming (briefly, SLP ) has been proposed to enhance the LP paradigm with a kind of approximate reasoning which supports flexible information retrieval applications. This approach uses a fuzzy similarity relation R between symbols in the program's signature, while keeping the syntax for program clauses as in classical LP . Another recent proposal is the QLP (D) scheme for Qualified Logic Programming, an extension of the LP paradigm which supports approximate reasoning and more. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We close this subsection with a brief discussion on the relationship between the entailment relation D,C used in this report and a different one that was proposed in (Caballero et al 2008) and noted S,D . In contrast to D,C , the entailment S,D depended on a given similarity relation S. In the context of the SQCLP scheme, one could think of an entailment S,D,C depending on S and defined in the following way: given two qc-atoms ϕ and ϕ , we could say that ϕ (S, D, C)-entails ϕ (in symbols, ϕ S,D,C ϕ ) iff ϕ : A d ⇐ Π and ϕ : A d ⇐ Π such that there is some substitution θ satisfying S(A , Aθ) = λ = b, d λ, d d and Π |= C Πθ.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We close this subsection with a brief discussion on the relationship between the entailment relation D,C used in this report and a different one that was proposed in (Caballero et al 2008) and noted S,D . In contrast to D,C , the entailment S,D depended on a given similarity relation S. In the context of the SQCLP scheme, one could think of an entailment S,D,C depending on S and defined in the following way: given two qc-atoms ϕ and ϕ , we could say that ϕ (S, D, C)-entails ϕ (in symbols, ϕ S,D,C ϕ ) iff ϕ : A d ⇐ Π and ϕ : A d ⇐ Π such that there is some substitution θ satisfying S(A , Aθ) = λ = b, d λ, d d and Π |= C Πθ.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The Bousi∼Prolog language (Julián-Iranzo et al 2009;Julián-Iranzo and Rubio-Manzano 2009b;Julián-Iranzo and Rubio-Manzano 2009a) has been designed with the aim of generalizing SLP to work with proximity relations. A different generalization of SLP is the SQLP scheme (Caballero et al 2008), designed as an extension of the QLP scheme. In addition to clause annotations in QLP style, SQLP uses a given similarity relation S : S × S → D (where D is the carrier set of a parametrically given qualification domain) in order to support flexible unification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In QLP a qualification domain D is associated to a program and their rules annotated with qualification values, resulting a parametric framework: QLP(D). In [5] they introduce similarity relations in their QLP(D) framework by adopting a transformational approach. The new Similarity-based QLP(D) scheme, named SQLP(D), transforms a similarity relation into a set of QLP(D) rules able to emulate a unification by similarity process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these languages implement (extended versions of) the resolution principle introduced by Lee [4], such as Elf-Prolog [5], Fril [6], F-Prolog [7] and MALP [8]. There exists also a family of fuzzy languages based on sophisticated unification methods [9] to cope with similarity/proximity relations, as occurs with LIKELOG [10], SQLP [11] and BOUSI∼PROLOG [12], [13] (some related approaches based on probabilistic logic programming can be found in [14], [15]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%