2015
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1093242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity judgments of same-category object representations: Effects of physical size, manipulability, and word frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We tested the thought extramission model by attempting to define a psychological function over the size of objects recorded in long-term memory under several sensory conditions. In a previous study (Dumitru & Joergensen 2015), we asked participants to evaluate object size or object similarity for homogeneous groups evoked by words read off a computer screen (e.g., 'rabbits' or 'elephants') and showed that objects of the same kind are evaluated as being more dissimilar to each other the bigger they are considered to be. The significant correlations we obtained between objects' size and objects' similarity demonstrate that concepts are organised as conceptual maps, hence as stable representations in the mind's eye.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested the thought extramission model by attempting to define a psychological function over the size of objects recorded in long-term memory under several sensory conditions. In a previous study (Dumitru & Joergensen 2015), we asked participants to evaluate object size or object similarity for homogeneous groups evoked by words read off a computer screen (e.g., 'rabbits' or 'elephants') and showed that objects of the same kind are evaluated as being more dissimilar to each other the bigger they are considered to be. The significant correlations we obtained between objects' size and objects' similarity demonstrate that concepts are organised as conceptual maps, hence as stable representations in the mind's eye.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%