2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00613-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity of small mammal abundance in post-fire and clearcut forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also reflects other findings, with faunal responses differing between harvested and burnt areas in some instances (Schulte and Niemi, 1998;Simon et al, 2002a) but not in others (Baker et al, 2004;Simon et al, 2002b). Differences between harvesting and wildfire, both in terms of structural characteristics and faunal responses, are likely to be greatest shortly after disturbance and converge over time (Simon et al, 2002b). Findings will also be influenced by forest ecosystem type, characteristics of the disturbance event, disturbance history, focal taxa or species, and spatial context.…”
Section: Comparison Between Harvested and Burnt Sitessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This also reflects other findings, with faunal responses differing between harvested and burnt areas in some instances (Schulte and Niemi, 1998;Simon et al, 2002a) but not in others (Baker et al, 2004;Simon et al, 2002b). Differences between harvesting and wildfire, both in terms of structural characteristics and faunal responses, are likely to be greatest shortly after disturbance and converge over time (Simon et al, 2002b). Findings will also be influenced by forest ecosystem type, characteristics of the disturbance event, disturbance history, focal taxa or species, and spatial context.…”
Section: Comparison Between Harvested and Burnt Sitessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The response of small mammals to fire is principally associated with the structural complexity of the shrub cover, which is itself influenced by time since fire (Krefting andAhlgren 1974, CrĂȘte et al 1995), fire severity (Martell 1984, Kirkland et al 1996, Ford et al 1999) and the amount of coarse woody debris (Menzel et al 1999, Simon et al 2002. Small mammal diversity and abundance generally decrease immediately after fire and tend to increase with regeneration and increased shrub cover during the following years.…”
Section: Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies show deer mice great increase in abundance in recently-burned areas in which they seem to greatly benefit from the abundant food resources provided by the massive seed bank of dead coniferous trees following fire (Sims and Buckner 1973, Krefting and Ahlgren 1974, Martell 1984, CrĂȘte et al 1995. Years after a fire, changes in vegetation provide habitat conditions that are attractive for other species of mice, voles and shrews (Sims and Buckner 1973, Krefting and Ahlgren 1974, CrĂȘte et al 1995, Simon et al 2002. For instance, the red-backed vole (Clethrionomys gapperi), which typically feeds on fungi and lichens (Gliwicz and Glowacka 2000) associated with late successional forests, will gradually recolonize post-fire forests as habitats become more suitable.…”
Section: Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in nontropical ecosystems, including deserts, grasslands, and temperate forests have recorded a decrease in the abundance of some species immediately after a wildfire (Quinn 1979, Fox 1982, Ojeda 1989, Fa and Sanchez-Cordero 1993, Churchfield 1997, Simon et al 2002, Converse et al 2006, reduced abundance in areas that are burned regularly (Sherburne-Junior 1959, Rana 1985 or the dominance of a few species in burned areas (Krefting & Ahlgren 1974, Kern 1981, Clark & Kaufman 1990. In most cases, the time elapsed since the disturbance seems to be an important variable determining the composition of the mammalian community (Vieira & Marinho-Filho 1998, Ford et al 1999, Simon et al 2002, Torre & DiĂĄz 2004, Fisher & Wilkinson 2005. In the Cerrado, Briani et al (2004) and Vieira (1999) found that small mammals were relatively tolerant to such impacts, and were especially abundant during the early successional stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%