2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity of the Jovian satellite footprints: Spots multiplicity and dynamics

Abstract: In the magnetospheres of Jupiter and Saturn, the intense interaction of the satellites Io, Europa, Ganymede and Enceladus with their surrounding plasma environment leaves a signature in the aurora of the planet. Called satellite footprints, these auroral features appear either as a single spot (Europa and Enceladus) or as multiple spots (Io and Ganymede). Moreover, they can be followed by extended trailing tails in the case of Io and Europa, while no tail has been reported for Ganymede and Enceladus, yet. Here… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar inferences apply to Europa's footprint; it has a similar intensity as Io's, but it is shorter and, being closer to the main oval, it is observable only for few tens of degrees in longitude. The footprint of Ganymede is visible, and it has two main spots [Bonfond et al, 2013a[Bonfond et al, , 2013b[Bonfond et al, , 2017~10°westward of the predicted locations (i.e., above, in the pictures, see the blue arrow in Figures 3c and 3d). It is visible particularly in Figure 3; the two spots are visible in Figures 3a and 3d; in Figure 3c they form a segment and they are undistinguishable.…”
Section: Satellite Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similar inferences apply to Europa's footprint; it has a similar intensity as Io's, but it is shorter and, being closer to the main oval, it is observable only for few tens of degrees in longitude. The footprint of Ganymede is visible, and it has two main spots [Bonfond et al, 2013a[Bonfond et al, , 2013b[Bonfond et al, , 2017~10°westward of the predicted locations (i.e., above, in the pictures, see the blue arrow in Figures 3c and 3d). It is visible particularly in Figure 3; the two spots are visible in Figures 3a and 3d; in Figure 3c they form a segment and they are undistinguishable.…”
Section: Satellite Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous HST observations suggest that the EP of the different footprint spots are variable over short timescales (Bonfond et al, , ). Fluctuations on the order of ∼30% are frequently observed for the different Io spots, as well as other footprint (e.g., Bonfond et al, ; Grodent et al, ). The fluctuations of the different spots are correlated for some λ III sectors, increasing the overall fluctuation of the entire footprint, when the spots are spatially unresolved.…”
Section: Modulation Of the Electrodynamic Interaction By Io's Atmosphmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Gurnett and Goertz (1981) suggested that multiple ionospheric reflections of such Alfvénic disturbances between north and south hemispheres of Jupiter (Figure 5d) could produce the pattern of arcs in the frequency‐time spectrograms of the Voyager Planetary Radio Astronomy instrument (Warwick et al, 1979). As Earth‐based telescopes improved, auroral emissions in Jupiter's atmosphere—IR, UV—revealed features at first associated with Io (Clarke et al, 1996; Connerney et al, 1993; Prange et al, 1996), and then not just Io but also Ganymede, Europa (Bonfond et al, 2017, Bonfond et al, 2017; Clarke et al, 2002; Grodent et al, 2006), and, recently, Callisto (Bhattacharyya et al, 2018). These auroral emissions (Figure 5c) indicate that the plasma‐satellite interactions all involve electrodynamic perturbations, which generate Alfvén waves propagating from the moon, carrying electric currents parallel to the magnetic field, accelerating electrons that bombard Jupiter's atmosphere and generate auroral emissions.…”
Section: Plasma‐satellite Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Note . (1) Saur et al (1999); (2) Saur et al (1998) calculated for a small upstream density ~40 cm −3 ; (3) Kivelson, Khurana, Walker, Linker, et al (1996); (4) Kivelson et al (1997); (5) Dols et al (2008); (6) Dols et al (2016); (7) Saur et al (2002); (8) Bagenal (1997); (9) Frank et al (1996); (10) Kurth et al (2001); (11) Retherford et al (2003, 2007); (12) Wolven et al (2001) and Ballester et al (1987); (13) Bouchez et al (2000) and Geissler et al (2004); (14) Roth et al (2016); (15) Roth et al (2011); (16) Hansen et al (2005); (17) Williams et al (1996); Williams & Thorne (2003) and Frankand Paterson (1999); (18) Mauk et al (2001); (19) Gerard et al (2006) and Bonfond et al (2008); (20) Bonfond, Grodent, et al (2017) and Grodent et al (2006); (21) Khurana et al (2011); (22) Roth, Saur, et al (2017); (23) Blöcker et al (2018); (24) Zimmer et al (2000) and Schilling et al (2004). …”
Section: Plasma‐satellite Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%