1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1888-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Similarity versus Preference in Fuzzy Set-Based Logics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case retrieval. Several similarity measurement metrics can be found in the literature, [16][17][18] which are commonly integrated within CBR and can be used for case retrieval. ABC4D uses the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) 19 classifier to retrieve the most similar case when compared to the current meal scenario.…”
Section: Initialization Of Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case retrieval. Several similarity measurement metrics can be found in the literature, [16][17][18] which are commonly integrated within CBR and can be used for case retrieval. ABC4D uses the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) 19 classifier to retrieve the most similar case when compared to the current meal scenario.…”
Section: Initialization Of Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it does not mean that all logics of graded truth are compositional (for instance, similarity logics using crisp propositions fuzzified by a fuzzy proximity relation (as done in [Ruspini, 1991]), are not compositional [Dubois and Prade, 1998b]. The information system paradigm underlying Zadeh's view of fuzzy truth values nevertheless questions the comparison made in [Gaines, 1978] between probabilistic logics which are not compositional, and a particular (max-min) many-valued logic which is truth-functional.…”
Section: Graded Truth Versus Degrees Of Uncertainty: the Compositionamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formula (q(x), µ P (x)) then expresses a piece of information of the form "the more x is P , the more certain q(x) is true". A fuzzy restriction on the scope of an existential quantifier can be also introduced in the following way [Dubois et al, 1998]. From the two classical first order logic premises "∀x ∈ A, ¬p(x, y) ∨ q(x, y)", and "∃x ∈ B, p(x, c)", where c is a constant, we can conclude that "∃x ∈ B, q(x, c)" provided that B ⊆ A.…”
Section: Variable Weights and Fuzzy Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a well-known interpretation of fuzzy sets; "similarity" is the key notion. For the similaritybased interpretation of fuzzy sets as well as other possible interpretations, we refer, e.g., to [5,6]. The idea to understand fuzzy sets as crisp sets together with a similarity relation is furthermore developed in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%