“…Simulation with three-dimensional (3D) print models may prove to be a major advantage in congenital cardiac surgery simulation, where trainees are not likely to see all of the extensive variations in the anatomy of congenital heart disease during training ( While cadaveric simulation curriculums have most commonly been incorporated into training in the neurosurgical, general surgical, orthopedic surgical, and trauma surgical specialties, interest in cadaveric simulation for application in teaching basic core surgical skills, common operative procedures, and advanced skills and operative procedures in cardiothoracic surgery as an adjunct to traditional operative training is becoming more prominent (Fig. 2) (Aboud et al, 2011;Inboriboon and Lumlertgul, 2013;Sharma et al, 2013;Massey et al, 2014;Bouma et al, 2015Bouma et al, , 2017Carey et al, 2015;Greene et al, 2015;Mavroudis et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016;Delpech et al, 2017;Faure et al, 2017;Karras et al, 2017;McLeod et al, 2017;Nesbitt et al, 2018a, b;Sarkar et al, 2018). Cadaveric models provide greater anatomical authenticity, which may be more advantageous for simulation of complex procedures that require greater anatomic accuracy for more advanced learners, full procedural simulations, anatomic dissection, and experience in less familiar surgical exposures (Kuhls et al, 2013).…”