“…Retention time (r.t.) and the mass spectrometric information are considered the golden criteria for structural elucidation of unknown compounds in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics. − Chemical-tagging-based metabolomics uses a derivatization reagent to label the subfunctional group in metabolites of interest. − Chemical labeling blocks some active groups and alters the metabolites’ retention behavior besides the well-known improvement in selectivity and sensitivity, allowing the strong regularity of the metabolites’ retention times. , Predicting the retention time of an unknown candidate could reduce the false-positive results to some extent from the available experiment information (r.t., accurate mass values, and MS/MS fragmentation). ,,,, Usually, three major advanced directions predict the retention time. , Deep-learning- or machine-learning-based retention time predictors are developed for small molecules up to 80 000 and peptides. , Transformed retention time prediction is also popular including normalized retention time, retention index, and retention order prediction. , Quantitative structure–retention relationship (QSRR) modeling is the most popular one using one or multiple molecular descriptors of the metabolite or the solid–liquid interface in LC. ,, QSRR usually utilizes multiple steps, such as the chemical structure construction (i.e., SMILES, mol, gjf, and xzy), molecular descriptor calculation (i.e., DRAGON, CODESSA, and RDkit), QSRR modeling establishment, and real situation application. ,− For example, Ovčačíková et al predicted the retention behavior of lipids by polynomial regression with the double bond number and carbon atom number . Some multilevel QSRR models are also developed using analyte-specific and chromatographically specific descriptors (log P, p K a , and functional groups). ,, …”