2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple and Reproducible Derivatization with Benzoyl Chloride: Improvement of Sensitivity for Multiple Lipid Classes in RP-UHPLC/MS

Abstract: The chemical derivatization of multiple lipid classes was developed using benzoyl chloride as a nonhazardous derivatization agent at ambient conditions. The derivatization procedure was optimized with standards for 4 nonpolar and 8 polar lipid classes and measured by reversed-phase ultrahighperformance liquid chromatography−tandem mass spectrometry. The derivatization and nonderivatization approaches were compared on the basis of the calibration curves of 22 internal standards from 12 lipid classes. The new me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6−8 Chemical labeling blocks some active groups and alters the metabolites' retention behavior besides the well-known improvement in selectivity and sensitivity, allowing the strong regularity of the metabolites' retention times. 9,10 Predicting the retention time of an unknown candidate could reduce the false-positive results to some extent from the available experiment information (r.t., accurate mass values, and MS/MS fragmentation). 1,2,4,11,12 Usually, three major advanced directions predict the retention time.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6−8 Chemical labeling blocks some active groups and alters the metabolites' retention behavior besides the well-known improvement in selectivity and sensitivity, allowing the strong regularity of the metabolites' retention times. 9,10 Predicting the retention time of an unknown candidate could reduce the false-positive results to some extent from the available experiment information (r.t., accurate mass values, and MS/MS fragmentation). 1,2,4,11,12 Usually, three major advanced directions predict the retention time.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention time (r.t.) and the mass spectrometric information are considered the golden criteria for structural elucidation of unknown compounds in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics. Chemical-tagging-based metabolomics uses a derivatization reagent to label the subfunctional group in metabolites of interest. Chemical labeling blocks some active groups and alters the metabolites’ retention behavior besides the well-known improvement in selectivity and sensitivity, allowing the strong regularity of the metabolites’ retention times. , Predicting the retention time of an unknown candidate could reduce the false-positive results to some extent from the available experiment information (r.t., accurate mass values, and MS/MS fragmentation). ,,,, Usually, three major advanced directions predict the retention time. , Deep-learning- or machine-learning-based retention time predictors are developed for small molecules up to 80 000 and peptides. , Transformed retention time prediction is also popular including normalized retention time, retention index, and retention order prediction. , Quantitative structure–retention relationship (QSRR) modeling is the most popular one using one or multiple molecular descriptors of the metabolite or the solid–liquid interface in LC. ,, QSRR usually utilizes multiple steps, such as the chemical structure construction (i.e., SMILES, mol, gjf, and xzy), molecular descriptor calculation (i.e., DRAGON, CODESSA, and RDkit), QSRR modeling establishment, and real situation application. , For example, Ovčačíková et al predicted the retention behavior of lipids by polynomial regression with the double bond number and carbon atom number . Some multilevel QSRR models are also developed using analyte-specific and chromatographically specific descriptors (log P, p K a , and functional groups). ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%