2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple and sensitive detection method for diprophylline using glutathione-capped CdTe quantum dots as fluorescence probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the signal-to-noise ratio is equal to three, it is generally accepted for estimating LOD [41]. The LOD is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation of the y-intercepts of regression lines by 3 and then dividing the obtained value by the slope of the calibration curve [41,42]. The LOD for the detection of copper (II) ions obtained is 4.38 × 10 –8 M. This result indicates that Probe 3 is highly sensitive to the detection of copper (II) ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the signal-to-noise ratio is equal to three, it is generally accepted for estimating LOD [41]. The LOD is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation of the y-intercepts of regression lines by 3 and then dividing the obtained value by the slope of the calibration curve [41,42]. The LOD for the detection of copper (II) ions obtained is 4.38 × 10 –8 M. This result indicates that Probe 3 is highly sensitive to the detection of copper (II) ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these two classic methods have timeconsuming cleanup steps and require large quantities of toxic organic solvents in order to obtain a homogeneous liquid phase containing an analyte of interest. There are many newly developed pre-treatment methods of β 2 -agonists CLEN determination, including molecularly imprinted matrix solid-phase dispersion (MI-MSPD) coupled with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) ultraviolet detection (Qiao and Du, 2013), surface molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) and micro-extraction in a packed syringe (SMIP-MEPS) (Du et al, 2014), MSPD and molecularly imprinted SPE (MISPE) (Huy et al, 2014), and MIP-capped cadmium telluride (CdTe) quantum dots (Qian et al, 2006;Huy et al, 2014;Ying et al, 2014). However, although there are many different procedures each claiming its own benefits, there is still a strong need for a simpler, effective, and efficient method for the extraction of the trace amount of analyte in complex mixtures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional methods for DPP detection mainly include titration, 1-3 spectrophotometry, [3][4][5] polarography, 6 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), [7][8][9][10] HPLC and chemometric assisted spectrophotometric methods 11 and the quantum dot fluorescence method. 12 However, there are some defects existing in these methods, such as the lack of specificity, long processing, high cost and potential interference from other factors, which have greatly limited their actual application. Therefore, a convenient, sensitive and rapid method for recognizing and detecting DPP is still highly demanded at present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%