Simple and Sensitive Method for Determination of Imidacloprid Residue in Soil and Water by HPLC

Samnani, Prakash B.; Vishwakarma, Kamlesh; Pandey, Shaliesh

doi:10.1007/s00128-011-0245-8

Cited by 18 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Many analytical methods for imidacloprid or imidacloprid metabolites have been reported, such as HPLC and LC–MS/MS . For example, Sharma et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many analytical methods for imidacloprid or imidacloprid metabolites have been reported, such as HPLC [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and LC-MS/MS [23][24][25][26]. For example, Sharma et al and Akoijam et al analyzed the residues of imidacloprid and its metabolites in soil, sugarcane leaves, juice, and rice, and they studied the metabolism and persistence of imidacloprid in different types of soils under laboratory conditions by HPLC.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method to simultaneously determinate chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid and imidacloprid metabolites in wheat

Huang

Qin

Luo

et al. 2019

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated to simultaneously determine chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, and imidacloprid metabolites in soil, wheat grain, and wheat straw matrices. Satisfactory linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9965) of the method was obtained for all analytes. The ranges of limits of detection and limits of quantification for seven analytes in three matrices were 0.17–66.7 and 0.5–200 μg/kg, respectively. Average recoveries were 72.85–81.25% for chlorpyrifos, 78.54–84.70% for imidacloprid, 73.83–81.03% for imidacloprid olefin, 71.47–80.61% for 5‐hydroxy imidacloprid, 71.79–81.32% for imidacloprid urea, 70.42–82.20% for imidacloprid nitroguanidine, and 70.91–82.46% for imidacloprid 6‐chloronicotinic acid in soil, wheat grain, and wheat straw. The intra‐ and interday relative standard deviations were less than 8%. The established method was successfully applied for the residual analysis of chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, and imidacloprid metabolites in actual soil, wheat grain, and wheat straw samples. The results indicated that the established method could be used to detect trace amounts of chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, and imidacloprid metabolites in wheat and that the method might be able to provide some data on the detection of these seven compounds in other crops.

show abstract

“…Many analytical methods for imidacloprid or imidacloprid metabolites have been reported, such as HPLC and LC–MS/MS . For example, Sharma et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method to simultaneously determinate chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid and imidacloprid metabolites in wheat

Huang

Qin

Luo

et al. 2019

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Liquid chromatography-based techniques have been widely used in determining imidacloprid in various samples [10][11][12][13]. As an alternative, immunoassays have been developed for imidacloprid for environmental detection with high sensitivity, selectivity, and throughput [14][15][16][17][18].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of phage-displayed peptides for the detection of imidacloprid in water and soil

Liu

Wang

et al. 2015

Analytical Biochemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Similarly, a quantitative analysis of imidacloprid in wheat-seed and soil has been reported (Guiying et al 2006). Similarly, Samnani et al (2011) have reported the quantitative determination of imidacloprid residues in soil and water samples.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Extraction, Cleanup, and Chromatographic Determination of Imidacloprid Residues in Wheat

Iqbal

Uddin

Saied

et al. 2012

Bull Environ Contam Toxicol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents an improved method for quantitative analysis of imidacloprid residues in wheat grain using high performance liquid chromatography. The study used chromatographic response (in terms of peak height) as a quantitative tool for determination instead of peak area. The peak height of imidacloprid showed a very good linear correlation (R(2) = 0.999) when compared with absolute values at six different concentrations. The limit of detection was found to be 0.01 μg/mL. The recovery of imidacloprid residues in spiked wheat grain at three levels (0.03, 0.05, and 0.1 μg/g) was in the range of 79%-88% with %RSD 5.72 at 0.05 μg/g (w/w) and between 87% and 93% with %RSD 3.55 at 0.1 μg/g (w/w). At 0.03 μg/g (w/w) level, recovery was not within the recommended range of 70%-110%. Therefore, the lowest limit of quantification for this method was found to be 0.05 μg/g.

show abstract

Simple and Sensitive Method for Determination of Imidacloprid Residue in Soil and Water by HPLC

Cited by 18 publications

References 4 publications

A liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method to simultaneously determinate chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid and imidacloprid metabolites in wheat

A liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method to simultaneously determinate chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid and imidacloprid metabolites in wheat

Selection of phage-displayed peptides for the detection of imidacloprid in water and soil

Extraction, Cleanup, and Chromatographic Determination of Imidacloprid Residues in Wheat

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About