1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00147776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple boundary correction for kernel density estimation

Abstract: If a probability density function has bounded support, kernel density estimates often overspill the boundaries and are consequently especially biased at and near these edges. In this paper, we consider the alleviation of this boundary problem. A simple unified framework is provided which covers a number of straightforward methods and allows for their comparison: 'generalized jackknifing' generates a variety of simple boundary kernel formulae. A well-known method of Rice (1984) is a special case. A popular line… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
288
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 436 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
288
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Density estimates computed using an Epanechnikov kernel. Since DWL is nonnegative in the constrained case, density is renormalized in the boundary area (Jones, 1993). Estimates computed using the same knot choice throughout as cross-validated for the median.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density estimates computed using an Epanechnikov kernel. Since DWL is nonnegative in the constrained case, density is renormalized in the boundary area (Jones, 1993). Estimates computed using the same knot choice throughout as cross-validated for the median.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a benchmark we report the results for the unfeasible ISE optimal bandwidth, h ISE . All the numbers have been multiplied by 100. and right one-sided cross-validation using the local linear kernel density estimator (Jones, 1993;andCheng 1997a, 1997b). In fact the method cannot work on local constant density estimation because of its inferior rate of convergence when applying to asymmetric kernels.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We record how often this is done, as frequent boundary normalization is symptomatic of substantial boundary leakage. Alternative approaches that use special boundary kernels [Hall and Wehrly, 1991;Wand et al, 1991;Djojosugito and Speckman, 1992;Jones, 1993] or work with log-transformed data could be used in cases where this method for handling the boundaries is found to be unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Kernel Density Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%