2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Derivatization of RAFT-Synthesized Styrene–Maleic Anhydride Copolymers for Lipid Disk Formulations

Abstract: Peak assignments of the Fourier-transform infrared spectra and solution NMR spectra of the synthesized SMADs and representative TEM images of SMADLPs made from POPC liposomes (PDF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include poly(styrene-co-maleimide) and various amine-modified SMA copolymers, rendering the resulting discs stable at low pH and insensitive to divalent cations. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Other polymers such as poly(diisobutylene-co-maleic acid) (DIBMA) and random polymethacrylate copolymers that are more resistant to divalent cations than SMA have emerged as promising alternative candidate polymers. 18,19 However, the field is limited in terms of controlling the monomer sequence distribution, and molecular weights, an innate limitation in the synthesis of SMA due to the reactivity ratios of STY and MAnh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include poly(styrene-co-maleimide) and various amine-modified SMA copolymers, rendering the resulting discs stable at low pH and insensitive to divalent cations. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Other polymers such as poly(diisobutylene-co-maleic acid) (DIBMA) and random polymethacrylate copolymers that are more resistant to divalent cations than SMA have emerged as promising alternative candidate polymers. 18,19 However, the field is limited in terms of controlling the monomer sequence distribution, and molecular weights, an innate limitation in the synthesis of SMA due to the reactivity ratios of STY and MAnh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no membrane mimetic systems are universally compatible to all membrane proteins requiring rigorous time-consuming optimization processes for their incorporation in a suitable membrane environment. Currently available and widely used membrane mimetic systems are detergent micelles, bicelles, liposomes, lipodiscs, and lipodisq nanoparticles/SMALPs (styrene maleic acid lipid particles) [12][13][14][15][16]. These membrane mimetic systems have their own benefits and limitations.…”
Section: Membrane Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nucleophilic addition to the electrophilic maleic anhydride moiety of SMAnh followed by a ring opening hydrolysis step, has led to the range of polymers shown in Figure 2a) with various R groups modulating the properties of polymers. [23,57] Each of these derivatives attained by nucleophilic addition and ring opening, showed an enhanced viability under lower pH values compared to SMA which aggregates beneath pH~6.3. SMA-Glu and SMA-EA produce copolymers with a negative charge and are active nanodisc agents in pH ranges of above pH~3 and~3.3, respectively.…”
Section: Functionally Modified Smanh Derivatives: Smadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMA-Glu was shown to best retain protein dynamics by continuous wave electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy line-shape analysis. [57] Use of methylamine, ethylamine and propylamine R substituents (SMA-MA, SMA-EtA and SMA-PA) derived from 1 : 1 SMAnh copolymers was found to alter the size and shape of Escherichia coli membrane native nanodiscs. The methylamine substituted polymer assembled into monodispersed nanodiscs of smaller size (~14 nm), while the longer alkyl derivatives formed worm-like nanostructures which tended towards aggregation.…”
Section: Functionally Modified Smanh Derivatives: Smadsmentioning
confidence: 99%