2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1448856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple expression for vacancy concentrations at half ion range following MeV ion implantation of silicon

Abstract: Mean concentrations CD of aggregated vacancy-type point-defect structures in float-zone Si implanted with H+, B+, Si+, O+, and Ge2+ ions at energies between 0.45 and 4.0 MeV have been measured as a function of ion dose φ at depths ∼RP/2 (half projected ion range) by beam-based positron spectroscopy. By adjusting φ to φA using factors given by the code TRIM, one arrives at the universal expression CD=(2.79×1010) φA0.63; CD (cm−3) can be estimated to ±50% for MeV ions implanted for φA from 109×1013 cm−2, which c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 were fitted using the code VEPFIT [25], requiring consistency between the S parameter for the damaged layer and the positron diffusion length in the layer. The average monovacancy concentration over the first 150 nm is estimated to be approximately 2 10 18 cm ÿ3 , corresponding (again approximately) to a total He ion dose of 10 12 cm ÿ2 [16]. The fitted S value characteristic of the monovacancy was found to be 1.027.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 were fitted using the code VEPFIT [25], requiring consistency between the S parameter for the damaged layer and the positron diffusion length in the layer. The average monovacancy concentration over the first 150 nm is estimated to be approximately 2 10 18 cm ÿ3 , corresponding (again approximately) to a total He ion dose of 10 12 cm ÿ2 [16]. The fitted S value characteristic of the monovacancy was found to be 1.027.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There has been considerable success in depth profiling openvolume point defects for a wide variety of ion masses and energies [16] and in identifying vacancy-impurity complexes [17], the interaction of vacancies with hydrogen and helium [18], and agglomeration into voids and cavities [19]. However, almost all of these studies have been performed on samples which have been held at room temperature after ion implantation and before VEPAS interrogation, so that the initial monovacancy damage (modeled, for example, by the widely used simulation code TRIM [20]) recombines and agglomerates so that only a few percent survives, predominantly as divacancies [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of the loss of vacancies outweighs that of the increase of defect size, and so S decreases in these two regions after 8.5 min. Because of the high implantation energy, the vacancy distribution can be regarded as uniform in the V-rich region [18], and a V 2 concentration of 8:5 10 18 cm ÿ3 in the region 1:1 m can be estimated with VEPFIT from PAS in the as-implanted sample. It is clear that the F concentration is higher than the vacancy concentration in region II.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This so-called R p /2 effect, already observed in other materials [39,40], arises from an incomplete cancellation, during cascade rearrangement, of interstitial and vacancy shifted-apart distributions. It has to be accounted for when ion beams are used to manufacture microelectronic chips, such as for instance in the so-called Smart Cut ® process (or "ion cut") [41], based on the build up of a sub-surface damage layer where cleavage can take place in order to remove a thin layer from its parent wafer.…”
Section: Surface Modification Of Materials By Ion Implantationmentioning
confidence: 69%